logiclife
06-04 01:45 PM
I guess we should ask them to remove the employer's restriction, which is the prime reason for extreme exploitation. H1b should not be restricitive. IV should also address the same. We are looking at the current problem with retrogression only, but what about future aspirants who come on H1.
H1B quota and H1B related issues are not primary concern of this organization. Greencard retrogression is. It has been that way since the inception 18 months ago.
We have taken positions to make H1B more workable and have less restrictions on it regarding H1 extensions and H1 transfers and therby opposed major portions of Durbin-Grassley.
HOwever, right now is not the time to debate and have open discussion on flaws of H1B program.
This is distraction at minimum and ammo for anti-groups in worst case scenario. Please contribute, send webfaxes, make phones and provide live updates and save this discussion on H1B flaws for slower times.
H1B quota and H1B related issues are not primary concern of this organization. Greencard retrogression is. It has been that way since the inception 18 months ago.
We have taken positions to make H1B more workable and have less restrictions on it regarding H1 extensions and H1 transfers and therby opposed major portions of Durbin-Grassley.
HOwever, right now is not the time to debate and have open discussion on flaws of H1B program.
This is distraction at minimum and ammo for anti-groups in worst case scenario. Please contribute, send webfaxes, make phones and provide live updates and save this discussion on H1B flaws for slower times.
wallpaper Emma Watson confesó haberse
samcam
09-16 11:28 AM
Do we get a notice to get biometrics done when you apply for EAD renewal?
My wife and I have a EAD renewal RD of June 23, 2008 at NSC. We have not gotten any LUD after that. Anybody knows how long it takes to get the EAD?
Thanks for the help guys..
My wife and I have a EAD renewal RD of June 23, 2008 at NSC. We have not gotten any LUD after that. Anybody knows how long it takes to get the EAD?
Thanks for the help guys..
Blog Feeds
12-22 02:30 PM
Dallas-Fort Worth Immigration Lawyer Has Just Posted the Following:
Effective January 4, 2010, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control and Prevention (HHS/CDC) is removing HIV from the list of communicable diseases of public health significance and references to HIV from the scope of medical examinations for foreign nationals.
Until the rule goes into effect, non-citizens who are HIV-positive cannot be admitted into the U.S. unless the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) grants a waiver. Once the rule goes into effect on January 4, 2010, HIV infection will no longer be defined as a communicable disease of public health significance, immigrant visa applicants who are required to undergo a medical screening exam will no longer be tested for HIV, a waiver for entry into the U.S. will no longer be necessary, and HIV-positive visa applicants will not be found ineligible for visas under Section 212(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). Although foreign nationals with HIV who apply for visas will no longer be ineligible under INA Section 212(a)(1)(A)(i), they still must overcome the public charge under INA Section 212(a)(4) by demonstrating to the consular officers that they will have the means of support in the U.S. and that they will not need to seek public financial assistance. Please visit CDC’s Web site (http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dq/laws_regs/fed_reg/remove-hiv/final-rule-hiv.htm) for more information.
More... (http://dfwimmigrationlaw.clarislaw.com/immigration-news/rule-change-on-cdc-list-of-communicable-diseases-of-public-health-significance.php)
Effective January 4, 2010, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control and Prevention (HHS/CDC) is removing HIV from the list of communicable diseases of public health significance and references to HIV from the scope of medical examinations for foreign nationals.
Until the rule goes into effect, non-citizens who are HIV-positive cannot be admitted into the U.S. unless the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) grants a waiver. Once the rule goes into effect on January 4, 2010, HIV infection will no longer be defined as a communicable disease of public health significance, immigrant visa applicants who are required to undergo a medical screening exam will no longer be tested for HIV, a waiver for entry into the U.S. will no longer be necessary, and HIV-positive visa applicants will not be found ineligible for visas under Section 212(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). Although foreign nationals with HIV who apply for visas will no longer be ineligible under INA Section 212(a)(1)(A)(i), they still must overcome the public charge under INA Section 212(a)(4) by demonstrating to the consular officers that they will have the means of support in the U.S. and that they will not need to seek public financial assistance. Please visit CDC’s Web site (http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dq/laws_regs/fed_reg/remove-hiv/final-rule-hiv.htm) for more information.
More... (http://dfwimmigrationlaw.clarislaw.com/immigration-news/rule-change-on-cdc-list-of-communicable-diseases-of-public-health-significance.php)
2011 Emma Watson, Rupert Grint
ajju
02-06 01:15 AM
Guess its easier.. and then they give negative reps instead of answers... Anyway.. Seems IV is losing focus and with this attitude of majority.. many more will go away...
I'll request all contributors to feel proud but don't boast all the time of your contributions and expect contributions from the others rather than questions...
I expect more negative.. as this is the latest trend in IV.. Anyway... where there is a will.. there is a way.. So I'll find my answer :-) and will continue answering folks who need... People will contribute at their pace and in the manner they feel good... You just can't force them... without being an example...
I'll request all contributors to feel proud but don't boast all the time of your contributions and expect contributions from the others rather than questions...
I expect more negative.. as this is the latest trend in IV.. Anyway... where there is a will.. there is a way.. So I'll find my answer :-) and will continue answering folks who need... People will contribute at their pace and in the manner they feel good... You just can't force them... without being an example...
more...
waiting4gc02
04-08 11:39 AM
Guys:
Just wanted to find out if you were aware if it makes any difference as to where you get your receipt from-- with respect to making an appointment(location).
What I mean is, would it be OK to get receipt from a HDFC branch in Mumbai, if you were going to make an appointment with New Delhi Embassy ?
Any experiences..?
Thanks
Just wanted to find out if you were aware if it makes any difference as to where you get your receipt from-- with respect to making an appointment(location).
What I mean is, would it be OK to get receipt from a HDFC branch in Mumbai, if you were going to make an appointment with New Delhi Embassy ?
Any experiences..?
Thanks
needhelp!
11-28 03:56 PM
Time to ACT!
more...
dce.deepak
05-25 10:00 AM
I am also planning to go to canada for stamping.
there is a travel warning for mexico because of drug war. TW04122010 - U.S. Consulate General Matamoros, Mexico (http://matamoros.usconsulate.gov/information_for_travelers/public-anouncements/tw04122010.html)
there is a travel warning for mexico because of drug war. TW04122010 - U.S. Consulate General Matamoros, Mexico (http://matamoros.usconsulate.gov/information_for_travelers/public-anouncements/tw04122010.html)
2010 Tom tom felton and emma watson
ho_gaya_kaya_?
11-20 08:41 PM
Another rule of thumb is that if you do not know whether your date is current or not- then you are probably not current :)
j/k...
j/k...
more...
billvor
10-13 10:00 AM
Question closed.
Yesterday my wife got six email with acceptance confirmation and case numbers (though I am principal applicant and we did file six forms with three G-1145 each with different email)
Yesterday my wife got six email with acceptance confirmation and case numbers (though I am principal applicant and we did file six forms with three G-1145 each with different email)
hair emma watson tom felton after
padraico
03-09 08:16 PM
i need to adjust my status, its needed in the i-485 application
more...
mhtanim
10-04 03:13 AM
http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/FAQ3.pdf
Q38: Where should an employment-based adjustment of status application be filed if the underlying I-140 petition remains pending with USCIS?
A38: Forms I-485 may be filed at either the Nebraska Service Center or the Texas Service Center in accordance with the Direct Filing Update issued June 21, 2007, regardless of where the pending I-140 was filed. Applicants should submit a copy of the I-140 receipt notice or, if the applicant does not have a receipt notice, include a brightly colored sheet of paper on top of the filing with the following notice and information:
This is what USCIS has officially announced. However, this does not address to your concern clearly (it does not say USCIS will reject any I-485 application filed in any other service center other than NSC or TSC). Anybody has any further information on the original question?
Q38: Where should an employment-based adjustment of status application be filed if the underlying I-140 petition remains pending with USCIS?
A38: Forms I-485 may be filed at either the Nebraska Service Center or the Texas Service Center in accordance with the Direct Filing Update issued June 21, 2007, regardless of where the pending I-140 was filed. Applicants should submit a copy of the I-140 receipt notice or, if the applicant does not have a receipt notice, include a brightly colored sheet of paper on top of the filing with the following notice and information:
This is what USCIS has officially announced. However, this does not address to your concern clearly (it does not say USCIS will reject any I-485 application filed in any other service center other than NSC or TSC). Anybody has any further information on the original question?
hot emma watson, harry potter,
smuggymba
10-13 12:44 PM
OPT Can work even for training only right!!!
everify company wthout pay! just incase if we dont get a job, just any employer offer letter is good right!!
pl correct me if I think wrong.....
SMUGGYMBA thanks for ur time
I'm talking about post completion OPT - if you have ur EAD card, u can travel with a valid and current employment letter. When it's pre-completion OPT, u r on F1 anyways so u should get stamping...
everify company wthout pay! just incase if we dont get a job, just any employer offer letter is good right!!
pl correct me if I think wrong.....
SMUGGYMBA thanks for ur time
I'm talking about post completion OPT - if you have ur EAD card, u can travel with a valid and current employment letter. When it's pre-completion OPT, u r on F1 anyways so u should get stamping...
more...
house Tom Felton amp; Emma Watson
itsokgc
01-07 01:02 PM
Guys,
I am July 3rd RD, 485 EBe Filer. My wife received her EAD. We had our FPs done and all cheques cleared.
My status shows that my application has been transferred from Nebraska to Texas on Sept 6th.
However, I am yet to receive my EAD.
I made an Infopass appointment for interim EAD. Is there anyone in the same boat?
I am July 3rd RD, 485 EBe Filer. My wife received her EAD. We had our FPs done and all cheques cleared.
My status shows that my application has been transferred from Nebraska to Texas on Sept 6th.
However, I am yet to receive my EAD.
I made an Infopass appointment for interim EAD. Is there anyone in the same boat?
tattoo Tom Felton amp; Emma Watson
hebbar77
01-13 11:21 AM
Hi Vikas,
I have 485 pending , 140 approved with priority date of 2007 apr.
What is NPR? If I am the one you are looking for , I can be contacted on 408-329-3565
Thanks
Mahesha Hebbar
I have 485 pending , 140 approved with priority date of 2007 apr.
What is NPR? If I am the one you are looking for , I can be contacted on 408-329-3565
Thanks
Mahesha Hebbar
more...
pictures Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson,
gc_hanged
01-05 06:22 AM
After The Fall: Making Sense Out Of Sensenbrenner by Gary Endelman (http://www.ilw.com/articles/2006,0104-endelman.shtm#bio)
Now we know how Tom Paine felt at Valley Forge. It has been a cold December for those who think immigration is good for America. On December 16th, the House of Representatives approved the Border Protection, Antiterrorism and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005(H.R.4437), perhaps the most draconian bill of recent memory, and, a mere three days later, the House approved an agreement with the Senate on a comprehensive budget reconciliation package stripped bare of any pro-immigration provisions. While there is some satisfaction in the fact that the House did not get the higher L fees that it sought, this is cold comfort. Truth be told, it was a tough week, the worst in a long time, and the shock among pro-immigration circles, both on Capitol Hill and beyond, is palpable.
Removal of Section 8001 from the Budget Reconciliation Conference Report can be a temporary setback if we play our cards right. Congressman Sensenbrenner has long and loudly proclaimed that he is not against all immigration, just the illegal variety. Fine. Let�s take him at his word. He is, after all, the architect of the new E-3 visa that enables 10,500 Australians to get around the H-1B cap. Congressman Sensenbrenner has his enforcement-only bill now so he should be prepared to support us when we seek to attach Section 8001 to broadly bipartisan legislation in the upcoming session of Congress. If Congressman Sensenbrenner means what he says, and he usually does, this might be a golden opportunity to bring Section 8001 back to life.
Source: www.ilw.com (http://www.ilw.com)
Now we know how Tom Paine felt at Valley Forge. It has been a cold December for those who think immigration is good for America. On December 16th, the House of Representatives approved the Border Protection, Antiterrorism and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005(H.R.4437), perhaps the most draconian bill of recent memory, and, a mere three days later, the House approved an agreement with the Senate on a comprehensive budget reconciliation package stripped bare of any pro-immigration provisions. While there is some satisfaction in the fact that the House did not get the higher L fees that it sought, this is cold comfort. Truth be told, it was a tough week, the worst in a long time, and the shock among pro-immigration circles, both on Capitol Hill and beyond, is palpable.
Removal of Section 8001 from the Budget Reconciliation Conference Report can be a temporary setback if we play our cards right. Congressman Sensenbrenner has long and loudly proclaimed that he is not against all immigration, just the illegal variety. Fine. Let�s take him at his word. He is, after all, the architect of the new E-3 visa that enables 10,500 Australians to get around the H-1B cap. Congressman Sensenbrenner has his enforcement-only bill now so he should be prepared to support us when we seek to attach Section 8001 to broadly bipartisan legislation in the upcoming session of Congress. If Congressman Sensenbrenner means what he says, and he usually does, this might be a golden opportunity to bring Section 8001 back to life.
Source: www.ilw.com (http://www.ilw.com)
dresses tom felton and emma watson
soni7007
04-09 02:20 PM
You will have to file with the new fee.
more...
makeup tom felton and emma watson
somegchuh
08-24 12:50 PM
My 140 (filed concurrently with 485) was approved on Aug 17th. Ever since 08/17 I have been seeing LUD's on it everyday. In fact there was a LUP on 08/19 Sunday! Any ideas what's happening? I think something is going in CIS.
girlfriend tom felton and emma watson
redelite
10-06 05:02 PM
....aaaaaaaaand to Temp for the idea ;)
hairstyles Double act: Tom Felton,
shirish
02-14 11:03 AM
I think he applied for 485 long back in those golden days, when every one was current.
jcrajput
10-03 11:15 AM
I need to re-file my I-485 application which was rejected due to USCIS error (they could not find I-140).
Can anybody tell me what is the logic behind writing "DO NOT OPEN IN THE MAIL ROOM" on envelope while re-submitting I-485 appplication?
I will need to send to USCIS today. Please let me know ASAP.
Thanks a lot.
Can anybody tell me what is the logic behind writing "DO NOT OPEN IN THE MAIL ROOM" on envelope while re-submitting I-485 appplication?
I will need to send to USCIS today. Please let me know ASAP.
Thanks a lot.
Z.Liu
02-23 01:46 PM
Hi, guys,
I'm having a little trouble with counting the years of experience for my EB2 petition. My attorney said I can only count the number of years I worked before joining the current sponsoring company!! The situation is, I jointed this company in Jan 2004. But my petition (Labor) appliction only started at the end of 2006. My attorney says that the three years of working experience (04, 05 & 06) can not be counted!
Is he correct on this?
thanks.
I'm having a little trouble with counting the years of experience for my EB2 petition. My attorney said I can only count the number of years I worked before joining the current sponsoring company!! The situation is, I jointed this company in Jan 2004. But my petition (Labor) appliction only started at the end of 2006. My attorney says that the three years of working experience (04, 05 & 06) can not be counted!
Is he correct on this?
thanks.
No comments:
Post a Comment