cr125rider
04-16 01:45 AM
That is the sprite of link walking right, this one is a WIP, got some font and organization issues. Thanks for the condtructive feedback RadioactiveChimp *sarcasm*. Thanks Kman.
wallpaper Tags: dog, funny, picture,
Saralayar
07-25 02:24 PM
Please let me know. My lawyer has taken my personal checks and sent them to USCIS...
Yes. My friend gave personal check and no issues. he finished his FP and waiting for his AP.:)
Yes. My friend gave personal check and no issues. he finished his FP and waiting for his AP.:)
webm
06-10 11:22 AM
This is really a good news!! :)
BTW,what about AP??
Mine was approved recently..UH just missed the boat this yr :(
I'm also pleased to announce that we will be extending the validity period of the employment authorization documents that we issue to individuals who are waiting adjustment of status to lawful permit residenture or in colloquial phrase, the green card.
Currently, adjustment applications are granted employment authorization documents with only a one year maximum validity. Beginning later this month, we'll start issuing these documents with a two-year validity period for aliens who are waiting adjustment of status if their application is expected to be pending for more than a year.
This, again, is eliminating a persistent source of frustration for workers who are here, who have a pending adjustment application but have to go and renew their employment documents every single year. It's going to cut the paperwork there.
BTW,what about AP??
Mine was approved recently..UH just missed the boat this yr :(
I'm also pleased to announce that we will be extending the validity period of the employment authorization documents that we issue to individuals who are waiting adjustment of status to lawful permit residenture or in colloquial phrase, the green card.
Currently, adjustment applications are granted employment authorization documents with only a one year maximum validity. Beginning later this month, we'll start issuing these documents with a two-year validity period for aliens who are waiting adjustment of status if their application is expected to be pending for more than a year.
This, again, is eliminating a persistent source of frustration for workers who are here, who have a pending adjustment application but have to go and renew their employment documents every single year. It's going to cut the paperwork there.
2011 Puppies - Banterous
wandmaker
12-11 09:37 PM
When you reach NSC or TSC, you talk to an IO. Who really is an IO? Are they first line of customer service at the centers? They then send requests etc to officers handling your cases?
I am trying to understand the relationship between the Customer Service agents, IOs and the case workers.
My understanding is:
Customer Service Rep (Level 1) - has access to little more information (like insights on processing times) than what you see online.
Customer Service Rep (Level 2) - has more access priviledge than CSR1, most of the time, s/he helps you open a high serverity service requests and/or direct your call to right resource to have your questions answered.
Immigration Officer (Customer Service) - Most of the people who use POJ end up in reaching IO CS, who has more insights about the case details (workflow, cards ready to be printed and etc), s/he will help you resolve the isssue or answer the question on hand.
Immigration Officer (Case Adjudication) - the one who is acutally working in the case, whom you will never be able to reach through POJ but It is possible to have your call routed through CSR2 or IO-CS - it all depends on your case issue and planet alignment.
Immigration Officer (Customer Service), Immigration Officer (Case Adjudication), the titles in the bracket are made up names to distingush the role. Long story short, both are immigration officers with different roles and access.
Others can throw more light on this
I am trying to understand the relationship between the Customer Service agents, IOs and the case workers.
My understanding is:
Customer Service Rep (Level 1) - has access to little more information (like insights on processing times) than what you see online.
Customer Service Rep (Level 2) - has more access priviledge than CSR1, most of the time, s/he helps you open a high serverity service requests and/or direct your call to right resource to have your questions answered.
Immigration Officer (Customer Service) - Most of the people who use POJ end up in reaching IO CS, who has more insights about the case details (workflow, cards ready to be printed and etc), s/he will help you resolve the isssue or answer the question on hand.
Immigration Officer (Case Adjudication) - the one who is acutally working in the case, whom you will never be able to reach through POJ but It is possible to have your call routed through CSR2 or IO-CS - it all depends on your case issue and planet alignment.
Immigration Officer (Customer Service), Immigration Officer (Case Adjudication), the titles in the bracket are made up names to distingush the role. Long story short, both are immigration officers with different roles and access.
Others can throw more light on this
more...
Janisaris
10-22 09:58 AM
I am in the same boat. Filed July 19th . As of Last Friday not in the system.
No checks cleared. All the guys who filed with me got their receipt last week from Texas. I am the only one remaining. My I140 was approved from NSC.
No checks cleared. All the guys who filed with me got their receipt last week from Texas. I am the only one remaining. My I140 was approved from NSC.
jasonalbany
04-09 06:28 PM
Hi,
Guys, I don't know how other people think about team IV and why some people suspect our team's ability. I think highly of them. They are in the same boat as we are now! Team IV is the best team I have seen to represent Employment Based Immigrants! The bill isn't dead!!! Don't give up, don't let pessimism overcome you and don't let hurdle confuse your vision!
Let's unite and work hard to move it. Good job, team IV!
Guys, I don't know how other people think about team IV and why some people suspect our team's ability. I think highly of them. They are in the same boat as we are now! Team IV is the best team I have seen to represent Employment Based Immigrants! The bill isn't dead!!! Don't give up, don't let pessimism overcome you and don't let hurdle confuse your vision!
Let's unite and work hard to move it. Good job, team IV!
more...
Blog Feeds
12-18 09:50 AM
AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjBQJhBEnaLvEML_OyPvTf2dBbz9NCXicdB0eFR6FxXciRLuj8H-Zq6AS0yZU8kZupuUGf2FW2ySNnTGj8iLcC7RxXMnW38ATAGvJsm-9-ca9gFbFGdb3Hw7BGlk-8iM1nhXC-MoUGFNmw/s320/2009-12-16+woman+in+prision.jpg (https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjBQJhBEnaLvEML_OyPvTf2dBbz9NCXicdB0eFR6FxXciRLuj8H-Zq6AS0yZU8kZupuUGf2FW2ySNnTGj8iLcC7RxXMnW38ATAGvJsm-9-ca9gFbFGdb3Hw7BGlk-8iM1nhXC-MoUGFNmw/s1600-h/2009-12-16+woman+in+prision.jpg)There was some good news Wednesday for asylum seekers. ICE assistant secretary John Morton announced that the government would no longer detain them if they can prove their identities, are not dangerous or a flight risk, and have a credible fear of persecution or torture in their home countries. http://bit.ly/4LM3F1
But it might be a tad early to celebrate.
The details of the plan are not yet clear. As Professor Regina Germaine of the Georgetown University Law Center observed in an email message to an Immigration Professors' Listserve, "the criteria for release has always been (since 1996) the 3 factors mentioned by John Morton - 1) ID, 2) not a danger or flight risk, and 3) credible fear. And the lack of one or more of these factors is cited when ICE refuses to release someone."
So, has Morton announced a new policy or has he simply restated the existing policy in a way which suggests release, but, in fact, will lead to continued detention of asylum seekers?
Another unanswered issue is whether the policy will be followed by ICE officers throughout the country. Professor Margaret Taylor of Wake Forest University suggests it's an open question. "Hopefully there will be 'buy in' and compliance in the field offices with this policy, but history suggests otherwise."
For now let's take the Administration at its word. But time will tell whether the draconian policy of incarcerating people who seek refuge in America has finally come to an end.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-808347624409550952?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/12/ice-announces-it-will-no-longer-detain.html)
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjBQJhBEnaLvEML_OyPvTf2dBbz9NCXicdB0eFR6FxXciRLuj8H-Zq6AS0yZU8kZupuUGf2FW2ySNnTGj8iLcC7RxXMnW38ATAGvJsm-9-ca9gFbFGdb3Hw7BGlk-8iM1nhXC-MoUGFNmw/s320/2009-12-16+woman+in+prision.jpg (https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjBQJhBEnaLvEML_OyPvTf2dBbz9NCXicdB0eFR6FxXciRLuj8H-Zq6AS0yZU8kZupuUGf2FW2ySNnTGj8iLcC7RxXMnW38ATAGvJsm-9-ca9gFbFGdb3Hw7BGlk-8iM1nhXC-MoUGFNmw/s1600-h/2009-12-16+woman+in+prision.jpg)There was some good news Wednesday for asylum seekers. ICE assistant secretary John Morton announced that the government would no longer detain them if they can prove their identities, are not dangerous or a flight risk, and have a credible fear of persecution or torture in their home countries. http://bit.ly/4LM3F1
But it might be a tad early to celebrate.
The details of the plan are not yet clear. As Professor Regina Germaine of the Georgetown University Law Center observed in an email message to an Immigration Professors' Listserve, "the criteria for release has always been (since 1996) the 3 factors mentioned by John Morton - 1) ID, 2) not a danger or flight risk, and 3) credible fear. And the lack of one or more of these factors is cited when ICE refuses to release someone."
So, has Morton announced a new policy or has he simply restated the existing policy in a way which suggests release, but, in fact, will lead to continued detention of asylum seekers?
Another unanswered issue is whether the policy will be followed by ICE officers throughout the country. Professor Margaret Taylor of Wake Forest University suggests it's an open question. "Hopefully there will be 'buy in' and compliance in the field offices with this policy, but history suggests otherwise."
For now let's take the Administration at its word. But time will tell whether the draconian policy of incarcerating people who seek refuge in America has finally come to an end.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-808347624409550952?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/12/ice-announces-it-will-no-longer-detain.html)
2010 Funny Puppies cut dog funny
PD_Dec2002
08-07 08:17 PM
500 dollar question.
LUD: Last Updated Date.
RD: Received Date
AD: Approval Date
Just being proactive here and telling u all the 'dates' so that u done open a new thread for the other ones tomorrow. ;-)
To add to your list...
ND: Notice Date
AP: Advance Parole
EAD: Employment Authorization Document
GC: Green Card
WFRD: Waiting Forever for Receipt Date
ASSSNRD: Applied for Social Security Still No Receipt Date
SGFBINC: Stuck in Goddamn FBI Name Check
GGCF: Got Green Card Finally
GGCFTOTC: Got Green Card Finally...Too Old To Celebrate
GGCFSUSBSS: Got Green Card Finally...Since US Born Son Sponsored.
Thanks,
Jayant
LUD: Last Updated Date.
RD: Received Date
AD: Approval Date
Just being proactive here and telling u all the 'dates' so that u done open a new thread for the other ones tomorrow. ;-)
To add to your list...
ND: Notice Date
AP: Advance Parole
EAD: Employment Authorization Document
GC: Green Card
WFRD: Waiting Forever for Receipt Date
ASSSNRD: Applied for Social Security Still No Receipt Date
SGFBINC: Stuck in Goddamn FBI Name Check
GGCF: Got Green Card Finally
GGCFTOTC: Got Green Card Finally...Too Old To Celebrate
GGCFSUSBSS: Got Green Card Finally...Since US Born Son Sponsored.
Thanks,
Jayant
more...
ak_2006
05-10 01:22 PM
Demand Data Used in the Determination of Employment Preference Cut-Off Dates
http://www.travel.state.gov/pdf/EmploymentDemandUsedForCutOffDates.pdf
India EB2 Reduced from 13,300 to 10,425 i.e. 2875 allocated for only EB2 I.
China EB2 Reduced from 3,900 to 3,675 i.e 225 allocated for only EB2 C.
http://www.travel.state.gov/pdf/EmploymentDemandUsedForCutOffDates.pdf
India EB2 Reduced from 13,300 to 10,425 i.e. 2875 allocated for only EB2 I.
China EB2 Reduced from 3,900 to 3,675 i.e 225 allocated for only EB2 C.
hair funny pictures of puppies with
gparr
February 26th, 2004, 11:12 PM
Sorry. I explained in the comments that go with the photo and should have included that here. This is a drinking bowl for dairy cattle manufactured by the Starline company, circa 1960. I found this in an old milking barn. The cow pushes her nose against the star-shaped lever and fresh water from the nozzle fills the bowl.
more...
.jpg "funny puppies and dogs.")
raysaikat
08-08 10:42 PM
Please help ....
You need ask in some other forum. This forum is only for employment based immigration.
You need ask in some other forum. This forum is only for employment based immigration.
hot amazing funny puppies.
p_t_smiles
June 9th, 2005, 07:03 AM
Whao!!!
I'm a newbi, and I have allways been fascinated by this effect, can you share any pointers!
Thanks
I know what you mean. I'm a newbie also and have been fascinated by that effect. I'm so excited that I have been able to get it.
Tracey
I'm a newbi, and I have allways been fascinated by this effect, can you share any pointers!
Thanks
I know what you mean. I'm a newbie also and have been fascinated by that effect. I'm so excited that I have been able to get it.
Tracey