chanduv23
10-17 12:52 PM
My 485 got approved 2 months back. There was an RFE for my wife and by the time I answered it, the visa numbers were over. Now I am planning to change my job. I know its good to wait for at least 6 months before you switch over, but I don't have that option. Can there be any issues with my wife's application?
The title is misleading - can be interpreted as "You are leaving your job and wife because you got an RFE and you want to know if there is any problem?"
The title is misleading - can be interpreted as "You are leaving your job and wife because you got an RFE and you want to know if there is any problem?"
wallpaper Crime Scene Photos #3
raj2007
06-13 11:25 PM
My husband is in the same position too.He is a fellow and got a job to start in 2008 july.lc dne.i 140 pending..
Can he file for i 485....ead for a future job...this has been in our head since this evening....cant wait till tomorrow morning to ask the lawyer:rolleyes:
can any1 explain this?
thanks.
CONGRATS to all to can file for i 485
Yes he can do this..
Can he file for i 485....ead for a future job...this has been in our head since this evening....cant wait till tomorrow morning to ask the lawyer:rolleyes:
can any1 explain this?
thanks.
CONGRATS to all to can file for i 485
Yes he can do this..
abhicyber
10-22 10:26 PM
Hi,
Any idea how long does it take to get AP approved after a soft LUD on AP?
I485/AP/EAD - NSC - Notice date 8/16/07.
FP: Done 09/29
EAD: Waiting
AP: Waiting (Soft LUD 10/22)
Thank you in advance.
AB
Any idea how long does it take to get AP approved after a soft LUD on AP?
I485/AP/EAD - NSC - Notice date 8/16/07.
FP: Done 09/29
EAD: Waiting
AP: Waiting (Soft LUD 10/22)
Thank you in advance.
AB
2011 the focus of crime scene
chanduv23
10-16 12:46 PM
^^^^^^^^
more...
birdwing
10-11 11:34 PM
i don't care anyway :lol:
Kirupa looks good as a priest :beer:
one day I'll understand these references.
until then I'll admit to being a complete and udder Nooooooob :trout:
Kirupa looks good as a priest :beer:
one day I'll understand these references.
until then I'll admit to being a complete and udder Nooooooob :trout:
GC_ki_daud
08-21 11:35 AM
Is there a number to call to hear a recording ;) just like we did for the bulletin before it was published :D
more...
smaram1
09-21 11:03 PM
I had Mar 05 PD through RIR but lost it as i never applied for I140. 4 other guys from my company are in the same boat as mine...
Current PD is Oct 05 through PERM...
By the way i dont think we can ever find the count between Jan 05 - Mar 05 through this thread...Data from FOIA request would be more helpful
Current PD is Oct 05 through PERM...
By the way i dont think we can ever find the count between Jan 05 - Mar 05 through this thread...Data from FOIA request would be more helpful
2010 Crime scene photos #2 - Page 7
cellphone
01-04 07:31 PM
http://www.cnn.com/exchange/ireports/topics/forms/2006/11/democrats.congress.html
link for those interested
link for those interested
more...
samuel5028
03-06 11:57 PM
Go to nearby embassy and inform about your situation. Make sure to keep all the documents and all also duplicate copy of your visa. Hopefully everything will be fine.
hair Crime scene photos #2 - Page 7
tejonidhi
01-14 09:36 AM
Itsokgc,
only talk to Immigration information officer. if none or available then it goes to regular Contractors workig for USCIS who will say we received the Application on date Blah Blah.
Tejonidhi
only talk to Immigration information officer. if none or available then it goes to regular Contractors workig for USCIS who will say we received the Application on date Blah Blah.
Tejonidhi
more...
uma001
06-14 02:42 PM
Since there is a mad rush of i485 applications , USCIS is going to do lottery to select applications for approval.Rest of them will be rejected.
Just kididng guys, take it easy.
Just gave a thought about it. USCIS can do anything. People who got rejection in H1b lottery feeling bad still.
Just kididng guys, take it easy.
Just gave a thought about it. USCIS can do anything. People who got rejection in H1b lottery feeling bad still.
hot I#39;m not even going to compare
ksairi
08-15 11:12 AM
please advice
more...
house The image lurred, and Parker
Blog Feeds
05-21 11:00 PM
Acting Associate Director Donald Neufeld has issued revised guidance regarding the
I-90 Application to Replace Permanent Resident Card. The guidance is dated February 6, 2009.
Previously, if an I-90 applicant presented a national security concern or had a record of arrest or presented an �Egregious Public Safety� concern, then the USCIS adjudicator was instructed to immediately suspend adjudication of the 1-90 and refer the case to ICE.
The problem with that position, as pointed out in the Neufeld memo, is that an I-90 applicant who is a Lawful Permanent Resident LPR holds that status until he or she either abandons it themselves or has it revoked through rescission or removal proceedings. Therefore, until the LPR status is either abandoned or revoked, the applicant is entitled to evidence of his or her status.
Now, the Neufeld memo provides that all 1-90 applications will be adjudicated when all of the basic filing requirements and conditions have been met:
1. The applicant has established his or her identity; and
2. It has been established that the applicant is a lawful permanent resident.
Once those conditions have been met, the I-90 should be approved regardless of whether derogatory information comes up during the fingerprint and IBIS checks. If that happens, the I-90 should still be approved first and the derogatory information issue addressed second, presumable with a referral to ICE.
In the past, some applicants have been served with Requests for Evidence (RFE) asking for arrest records or court dispositions. Now any RFE that is issued must be limited to requesting supporting documentation related to establishing identity or status.
.
More... (http://www.philadelphiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/2009/05/i90_appliication_to_replace_gr.html)
I-90 Application to Replace Permanent Resident Card. The guidance is dated February 6, 2009.
Previously, if an I-90 applicant presented a national security concern or had a record of arrest or presented an �Egregious Public Safety� concern, then the USCIS adjudicator was instructed to immediately suspend adjudication of the 1-90 and refer the case to ICE.
The problem with that position, as pointed out in the Neufeld memo, is that an I-90 applicant who is a Lawful Permanent Resident LPR holds that status until he or she either abandons it themselves or has it revoked through rescission or removal proceedings. Therefore, until the LPR status is either abandoned or revoked, the applicant is entitled to evidence of his or her status.
Now, the Neufeld memo provides that all 1-90 applications will be adjudicated when all of the basic filing requirements and conditions have been met:
1. The applicant has established his or her identity; and
2. It has been established that the applicant is a lawful permanent resident.
Once those conditions have been met, the I-90 should be approved regardless of whether derogatory information comes up during the fingerprint and IBIS checks. If that happens, the I-90 should still be approved first and the derogatory information issue addressed second, presumable with a referral to ICE.
In the past, some applicants have been served with Requests for Evidence (RFE) asking for arrest records or court dispositions. Now any RFE that is issued must be limited to requesting supporting documentation related to establishing identity or status.
.
More... (http://www.philadelphiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/2009/05/i90_appliication_to_replace_gr.html)
tattoo Truth be told, I#39;m not sure
Blog Feeds
06-09 02:10 PM
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgJN1Z0bA9Uw3lIIQ5oaG7CaQWQO29sJjt75eIl7eJo_FnRitP3T_JCrUR8lp4dy-RRpkt5U7JlE4MU5jqlR4o6STdUSLsem19bxNAef4PaTr1sEzSlwiNyu1JdOQKMJHikmxTdQ60yVyJZ/s200/gay+wedding.jpg (https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgJN1Z0bA9Uw3lIIQ5oaG7CaQWQO29sJjt75eIl7eJo_FnRitP3T_JCrUR8lp4dy-RRpkt5U7JlE4MU5jqlR4o6STdUSLsem19bxNAef4PaTr1sEzSlwiNyu1JdOQKMJHikmxTdQ60yVyJZ/s1600-h/gay+wedding.jpg)
Sen. Patrick Leahy ( D-Vermont ) introduced the Uniting American Families Act ( S. 424 ) earlier this year; it has 18 co-sponsors. The bill would allow same sex couples the same immigration rights as married heterosexual couples. Passage of the bill is likely to be tied to overall immigration reform.
At the moment, same-sex partners of legal immigrants do not have the same rights to dependent status that heterosexual spouses get. This is true even if the couple is legally married in their home country. Often, the "dependent" partner must apply for a B-2 visitor visa at the consulate, to accompany his/her partner. This visa is discretionary, and consulates could refuse to issue it. In addition, B-2 status does not allow the dependent partner to work in the US. Many heterosexual dependent spouses have a status that doesn't allow them to work either, however.
As the New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/03/us/politics/03immig.html) reports:
Senator Leahy�s bill would add the term �permanent partner� to sections of current immigration law that refer to married couples, and would provide a legal definition of those terms.
�I just think it�s a matter of fairness,� he said Tuesday in an interview, noting that a number of American allies, including Canada, France and Germany, recognize same-sex couples in immigration law. Photo by http://www.flickr.com/photos/boscobridalexpos/
http://immigrationvoice.org//blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2893395975825897727-1281256503142232618?l=martinvisalaw.blogspot.com
More... (http://martinvisalaw.blogspot.com/2009/06/immigration-rights-for-gay-couples.html)
Sen. Patrick Leahy ( D-Vermont ) introduced the Uniting American Families Act ( S. 424 ) earlier this year; it has 18 co-sponsors. The bill would allow same sex couples the same immigration rights as married heterosexual couples. Passage of the bill is likely to be tied to overall immigration reform.
At the moment, same-sex partners of legal immigrants do not have the same rights to dependent status that heterosexual spouses get. This is true even if the couple is legally married in their home country. Often, the "dependent" partner must apply for a B-2 visitor visa at the consulate, to accompany his/her partner. This visa is discretionary, and consulates could refuse to issue it. In addition, B-2 status does not allow the dependent partner to work in the US. Many heterosexual dependent spouses have a status that doesn't allow them to work either, however.
As the New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/03/us/politics/03immig.html) reports:
Senator Leahy�s bill would add the term �permanent partner� to sections of current immigration law that refer to married couples, and would provide a legal definition of those terms.
�I just think it�s a matter of fairness,� he said Tuesday in an interview, noting that a number of American allies, including Canada, France and Germany, recognize same-sex couples in immigration law. Photo by http://www.flickr.com/photos/boscobridalexpos/
http://immigrationvoice.org//blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2893395975825897727-1281256503142232618?l=martinvisalaw.blogspot.com
More... (http://martinvisalaw.blogspot.com/2009/06/immigration-rights-for-gay-couples.html)
more...
pictures Re: Caylee Marie Anthony, 2,
laksmi
07-02 03:34 PM
Irrespective of I-140, you may add your dependents names during 485 filing stage if you date is current.
dresses Is IV not with Eb3 folks? Or are they not important.
vban2007
02-15 03:38 PM
Hi,
You do not even need to file AC21.. I changed my employer on EAD from H1B and no issue and got GC also.
Good Luck
You do not even need to file AC21.. I changed my employer on EAD from H1B and no issue and got GC also.
Good Luck
more...
makeup the wings are lurred.
wizard
04-27 09:47 PM
I like the third one best, good job. ;)
girlfriend I am no expert in this matter
mpgc
05-18 10:26 AM
Friends:
Two weeks ago I received an RFE for my E-Filed I-131 Advance Parole.
They requested two passport-style Photos but didn't mention where to send the RFE response.
However, on the top right-corner (next to the US Dept. Homeland security Logo) on the RFE page, there is an address (P.O Box 852381 Mesquite, Texas 75185-2381).
Underneath of the Director signature it has Officer # 159.
I'm really confused
1. Which address to send the RFE response?
2. Attention to what??? (Should I put Attn: to this officer # 159)
Please guide me ASAP...
Two weeks ago I received an RFE for my E-Filed I-131 Advance Parole.
They requested two passport-style Photos but didn't mention where to send the RFE response.
However, on the top right-corner (next to the US Dept. Homeland security Logo) on the RFE page, there is an address (P.O Box 852381 Mesquite, Texas 75185-2381).
Underneath of the Director signature it has Officer # 159.
I'm really confused
1. Which address to send the RFE response?
2. Attention to what??? (Should I put Attn: to this officer # 159)
Please guide me ASAP...
hairstyles single direction not
blue_chi
09-09 02:52 AM
FORMAT YOUR PC AND TRY INSTALLATION AGAIN!
lol ;)
lol ;)
myimmiv
06-08 03:51 PM
Thanks Elaine for your reply. Yes you are right, it is a substituted labor, but I have raised the concern because my PD is May 2005 which is after PERM came in effect. Hence how did the lawyer use the old (pre PERM) EAT 750B for this labor ?
ronhira
03-22 06:40 PM
tom friedman doesn't know about the details of this issue..... for him immigration means more h1b visa..... he doesn't have a clue @ gc mess...... there r others who have done research on this subject.... but those studies did not get as much attention.... maybe others need to come up with a shape... lets pick one.... lets say "earth is rhombus".... and then publish these reports... that might help catch some attention....
Source - http://www.nfap.com/pdf/071206study.pdf
"THE CHILDREN OF H-1B VISA HOLDERS
At the 2004 Intel Science Talent Search, the nation’s premiere science competition for top high school students, the National Foundation for American Policy conducted interviews to determine the immigration background of the 40 finalists. The results: two-thirds of the Intel Science Talent Search finalists were the children of immigrants. And even though new H-1B visa holders each year represent only 0.03 percent of the U.S. population, it turns out more of the children had parents who entered the country on H-1B visas than had parents born in the United States. In other words, if critics had their way, many of the coming generation’s top scientists and engineers would not be here in the United States today – because we never would have allowed in their parents."
Source - http://www.nfap.com/pdf/071206study.pdf
"THE CHILDREN OF H-1B VISA HOLDERS
At the 2004 Intel Science Talent Search, the nation’s premiere science competition for top high school students, the National Foundation for American Policy conducted interviews to determine the immigration background of the 40 finalists. The results: two-thirds of the Intel Science Talent Search finalists were the children of immigrants. And even though new H-1B visa holders each year represent only 0.03 percent of the U.S. population, it turns out more of the children had parents who entered the country on H-1B visas than had parents born in the United States. In other words, if critics had their way, many of the coming generation’s top scientists and engineers would not be here in the United States today – because we never would have allowed in their parents."
No comments:
Post a Comment