arulz
10-12 01:10 PM
I was in Canada and came back to US last weekend using AP. I only had two documents. They asked for three but I told them that I only have two and that is all I got from USCIS.
They made me wait for 15 minutes and then stamped both AP documents and gave it back to me with an I 94 and entry date/stamp.
I believe you should have your Advance Parole document and not with the immigration.
They made me wait for 15 minutes and then stamped both AP documents and gave it back to me with an I 94 and entry date/stamp.
I believe you should have your Advance Parole document and not with the immigration.
wallpaper The disorder
Madhuri
05-28 06:56 PM
If you are e-filing, answer to Q 15 is not mandatory, so I guess if in doubt it's safe to skip it.
Folks;
Would greatly appreciate your response for following quick inquires;
Q.#11 Dates ... is this the date I signed the I-765 application, or lawyer signed, or the date we mailed or the date USCIS recieved the application?:confused:
Q. #15 Current Immigration Status ... I researched on this forum and concur with those who say AOS.:)
Q.#16 Eligibility under 8 CFR 274a.12 ... Selected (c)(9)(). I filed during July-07 under EB2 category. Also this is what was mentioned on my original I-765 application that had been approved last year.:rolleyes:
Folks;
Would greatly appreciate your response for following quick inquires;
Q.#11 Dates ... is this the date I signed the I-765 application, or lawyer signed, or the date we mailed or the date USCIS recieved the application?:confused:
Q. #15 Current Immigration Status ... I researched on this forum and concur with those who say AOS.:)
Q.#16 Eligibility under 8 CFR 274a.12 ... Selected (c)(9)(). I filed during July-07 under EB2 category. Also this is what was mentioned on my original I-765 application that had been approved last year.:rolleyes:
amaacnt27
04-01 07:15 AM
roseball,
Thank you.
Thank you.
2011 Megan Fox
wc_user
07-21 01:47 PM
Hi,
I have a question regarding Priority Date Re-capture. When a new I-140 is filed requesting priority date re-capture from the old I-140, what happens to the old I-140. I hope the old I-140 is not cancelled. The reason I ask is, if the new I-140 runs into any issues, I don't want to lose the old I-140 as well. Thanks.
I have a question regarding Priority Date Re-capture. When a new I-140 is filed requesting priority date re-capture from the old I-140, what happens to the old I-140. I hope the old I-140 is not cancelled. The reason I ask is, if the new I-140 runs into any issues, I don't want to lose the old I-140 as well. Thanks.
more...
vedicman
01-25 12:46 PM
(I will appreciate if anyone could help me figure out how to create a new thread.)
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/forum85-action-items-for-everyone/17658-how-to-post-a-question-how-to-start-a-new-thread-etc.html
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/forum85-action-items-for-everyone/17658-how-to-post-a-question-how-to-start-a-new-thread-etc.html
dbzfan33
10-07 12:10 AM
ohh ohh ohh ohh, i hope no one already did it! cause i was about to ask if someone could also do just the letter M. Rotating.
more...
babu123
03-31 05:10 PM
Dear Friends,
I am a derived applicant in my green card process and recently I converted to EAD status from H1B.
My sister is US citizen. I would like to know if I am eligible to file another set of green card application thru family based option that is available. I know its a long queue.
I want to know if I am eligible for this process.
If I am eligible to file, am I eligible to file EAD thru that application as well.
Thanks
I am a derived applicant in my green card process and recently I converted to EAD status from H1B.
My sister is US citizen. I would like to know if I am eligible to file another set of green card application thru family based option that is available. I know its a long queue.
I want to know if I am eligible for this process.
If I am eligible to file, am I eligible to file EAD thru that application as well.
Thanks
2010 Megan Fox has clubbed thumbs.
the_jaguar
10-02 12:37 PM
It's taking anywhere between 4 to 6 weeks on an average after the introduction of the new lockbox system. We received our receipts in 29 days, so I don't think you should panic yet :)
more...
gcfriend65
03-19 04:28 PM
I think they don't have much to say. Look he even got an award from the Semiconductor Association of America for pushing Maths and Science in America. Not to mention the SKIL bill.
what are they saying
what are they saying
hair Recent Megan Fox Clubbed Thumb
lord_labaku
10-13 10:29 AM
Pls. google USCIS pages for official info. You cannot stay for more than 6 months away from US each year every year. The situation might be different if its a US based company abroad.
more...
BharatPremi
09-20 09:16 PM
"Na Koi Umang Hai, Na Koi Tarang Hai".. "Meri Zindgi hai kya Kati Patang Hai" :mad:
hot quot;Her thumbs look like two big
baburob2
08-21 09:21 PM
I-94 determines your status in US and visa stamp is a merely used to enter into US .hence make sure your I-94 is stamped till the expiry date of new I-797 otherwise you would get into issues.
more...
house hot dresses megan fox thumb
PlainSpeak
02-10 12:40 PM
Indeed dot com
tattoo Megan Fox Has Potential Flaw
logiclife
06-04 01:22 PM
Here is the link to SA 1150, the real bill text debated.
http://immigrationvoice.org/media/forums/Immigration_Bill_Substitute.pdf
http://immigrationvoice.org/media/forums/Immigration_Bill_Substitute.pdf
more...
pictures megan fox thumb disorder.
Blog Feeds
05-21 11:00 PM
Acting Associate Director Donald Neufeld has issued revised guidance regarding the
I-90 Application to Replace Permanent Resident Card. The guidance is dated February 6, 2009.
Previously, if an I-90 applicant presented a national security concern or had a record of arrest or presented an �Egregious Public Safety� concern, then the USCIS adjudicator was instructed to immediately suspend adjudication of the 1-90 and refer the case to ICE.
The problem with that position, as pointed out in the Neufeld memo, is that an I-90 applicant who is a Lawful Permanent Resident LPR holds that status until he or she either abandons it themselves or has it revoked through rescission or removal proceedings. Therefore, until the LPR status is either abandoned or revoked, the applicant is entitled to evidence of his or her status.
Now, the Neufeld memo provides that all 1-90 applications will be adjudicated when all of the basic filing requirements and conditions have been met:
1. The applicant has established his or her identity; and
2. It has been established that the applicant is a lawful permanent resident.
Once those conditions have been met, the I-90 should be approved regardless of whether derogatory information comes up during the fingerprint and IBIS checks. If that happens, the I-90 should still be approved first and the derogatory information issue addressed second, presumable with a referral to ICE.
In the past, some applicants have been served with Requests for Evidence (RFE) asking for arrest records or court dispositions. Now any RFE that is issued must be limited to requesting supporting documentation related to establishing identity or status.
.
More... (http://www.philadelphiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/2009/05/i90_appliication_to_replace_gr.html)
I-90 Application to Replace Permanent Resident Card. The guidance is dated February 6, 2009.
Previously, if an I-90 applicant presented a national security concern or had a record of arrest or presented an �Egregious Public Safety� concern, then the USCIS adjudicator was instructed to immediately suspend adjudication of the 1-90 and refer the case to ICE.
The problem with that position, as pointed out in the Neufeld memo, is that an I-90 applicant who is a Lawful Permanent Resident LPR holds that status until he or she either abandons it themselves or has it revoked through rescission or removal proceedings. Therefore, until the LPR status is either abandoned or revoked, the applicant is entitled to evidence of his or her status.
Now, the Neufeld memo provides that all 1-90 applications will be adjudicated when all of the basic filing requirements and conditions have been met:
1. The applicant has established his or her identity; and
2. It has been established that the applicant is a lawful permanent resident.
Once those conditions have been met, the I-90 should be approved regardless of whether derogatory information comes up during the fingerprint and IBIS checks. If that happens, the I-90 should still be approved first and the derogatory information issue addressed second, presumable with a referral to ICE.
In the past, some applicants have been served with Requests for Evidence (RFE) asking for arrest records or court dispositions. Now any RFE that is issued must be limited to requesting supporting documentation related to establishing identity or status.
.
More... (http://www.philadelphiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/2009/05/i90_appliication_to_replace_gr.html)
dresses Megan+fox+thumb+disease;
Blog Feeds
12-22 02:30 PM
Dallas-Fort Worth Immigration Lawyer Has Just Posted the Following:
Effective January 4, 2010, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control and Prevention (HHS/CDC) is removing HIV from the list of communicable diseases of public health significance and references to HIV from the scope of medical examinations for foreign nationals.
Until the rule goes into effect, non-citizens who are HIV-positive cannot be admitted into the U.S. unless the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) grants a waiver. Once the rule goes into effect on January 4, 2010, HIV infection will no longer be defined as a communicable disease of public health significance, immigrant visa applicants who are required to undergo a medical screening exam will no longer be tested for HIV, a waiver for entry into the U.S. will no longer be necessary, and HIV-positive visa applicants will not be found ineligible for visas under Section 212(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). Although foreign nationals with HIV who apply for visas will no longer be ineligible under INA Section 212(a)(1)(A)(i), they still must overcome the public charge under INA Section 212(a)(4) by demonstrating to the consular officers that they will have the means of support in the U.S. and that they will not need to seek public financial assistance. Please visit CDC’s Web site (http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dq/laws_regs/fed_reg/remove-hiv/final-rule-hiv.htm) for more information.
More... (http://dfwimmigrationlaw.clarislaw.com/immigration-news/rule-change-on-cdc-list-of-communicable-diseases-of-public-health-significance.php)
Effective January 4, 2010, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control and Prevention (HHS/CDC) is removing HIV from the list of communicable diseases of public health significance and references to HIV from the scope of medical examinations for foreign nationals.
Until the rule goes into effect, non-citizens who are HIV-positive cannot be admitted into the U.S. unless the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) grants a waiver. Once the rule goes into effect on January 4, 2010, HIV infection will no longer be defined as a communicable disease of public health significance, immigrant visa applicants who are required to undergo a medical screening exam will no longer be tested for HIV, a waiver for entry into the U.S. will no longer be necessary, and HIV-positive visa applicants will not be found ineligible for visas under Section 212(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). Although foreign nationals with HIV who apply for visas will no longer be ineligible under INA Section 212(a)(1)(A)(i), they still must overcome the public charge under INA Section 212(a)(4) by demonstrating to the consular officers that they will have the means of support in the U.S. and that they will not need to seek public financial assistance. Please visit CDC’s Web site (http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dq/laws_regs/fed_reg/remove-hiv/final-rule-hiv.htm) for more information.
More... (http://dfwimmigrationlaw.clarislaw.com/immigration-news/rule-change-on-cdc-list-of-communicable-diseases-of-public-health-significance.php)
more...
makeup megan fox thumb disorder.
supers789
01-02 06:40 PM
can someone please reply?
girlfriend wallpaper megan fox thumb
rpat1968
08-07 06:46 PM
Interesting news posting today in "Dallas Morning News" :
http://www.competeamerica.org/news/media_coverage/2006_08/20060807_visapolicies.html
Have you guys seen the letters written by Compete America Board to US Senators and Congressmen. The points they talk about are very similar to the issues identified by us. You may browse the section when you have some time. The link is
http://www.competeamerica.org/hill/letter_congress/index.html
http://www.competeamerica.org/news/media_coverage/2006_08/20060807_visapolicies.html
Have you guys seen the letters written by Compete America Board to US Senators and Congressmen. The points they talk about are very similar to the issues identified by us. You may browse the section when you have some time. The link is
http://www.competeamerica.org/hill/letter_congress/index.html
hairstyles hair megan fox thumb disease.
hebbar77
03-17 06:20 PM
Hi Folks.
Whats the cost of filing a motion to reopen the case 485 if wrongly rejected(either due to using AC21...). I mean lawyer fees + other fees.
I am sure there are folks here who went through this.
Whats the cost of filing a motion to reopen the case 485 if wrongly rejected(either due to using AC21...). I mean lawyer fees + other fees.
I am sure there are folks here who went through this.
shana04
01-30 07:06 AM
I currently have approved EAD, I-140 and waiting for a Visa number to become available. My receipt date for I-485 was July 2nd 2007 and my notice date was September 27th. My employer is closing the IT department in March. Though it has been 180 days since my receipt date, it's not 180 days since my notice date. Will my I-485 processing be impacted when a Visa number becomes available? Also, will it be Ok if I'm out of a job for a short time while I'm looking for my next job? I sincerely appreciate the help and guidance in this matter.
Thanks
it's not 180 days since my notice date. Will my I-485 processing be impacted when a Visa number becomes available?
No
will it be Ok if I'm out of a job for a short time while I'm looking for my next job?
.
If you are planning to use EAD no problem, but if you are planning to use AC21 with H1B then you need to maintain valid status as specified in your H1B. i.e., if you can mainting the salary specified in your offer letter and if that matches your W2 for the year, then you are ok.
These are my thoughts.
Good luck my friend and I am in process of doing my H1B using AC21
Thanks
it's not 180 days since my notice date. Will my I-485 processing be impacted when a Visa number becomes available?
No
will it be Ok if I'm out of a job for a short time while I'm looking for my next job?
.
If you are planning to use EAD no problem, but if you are planning to use AC21 with H1B then you need to maintain valid status as specified in your H1B. i.e., if you can mainting the salary specified in your offer letter and if that matches your W2 for the year, then you are ok.
These are my thoughts.
Good luck my friend and I am in process of doing my H1B using AC21
ruchigup
05-01 02:34 PM
I just talked with my current employer, and they seems willing to sign letter as appropriate in respondin to RFE.
No comments:
Post a Comment