blogger
10-11 06:16 PM
I know a colleague of mine who also changed from L1 to H1 last year but he joined his new job after 2 months from Oct 1 .
I have also read that only when you go out of the country and when you stamp your visa thats when one of the visa goes invalid.
Is this right?
Dude,
You are already out of status as you are not on L anymore. As of october 01st, your status changed to H-1b and you can only be employed by your H-1b employer.
Talk to a lawyer who knows L stuff (not many do) and straighten things out.
I have also read that only when you go out of the country and when you stamp your visa thats when one of the visa goes invalid.
Is this right?
Dude,
You are already out of status as you are not on L anymore. As of october 01st, your status changed to H-1b and you can only be employed by your H-1b employer.
Talk to a lawyer who knows L stuff (not many do) and straighten things out.
wallpaper 2011 and princess diana.
aguy
07-21 05:13 PM
i checked on the website, couldnt find it there. i will try calling the number when i get home. i asked in case anyone had the a similar question.
thanks,
ashish
thanks,
ashish
manderson
11-11 02:58 PM
that's pretty funny.
2011 Princess Diana Pop-Up Book [18
Marphad
01-06 01:59 PM
Change.org (http://www.change.org/ideas/browse) (pick Immigration in the browse by cause box on the right side of the screen) is now actively voting on various ideas.
There are 3 ideas there, but none for our cause.
I am no pro on these, but may be we could get an idea inserted for our cause and get enough votes on it.
Thanks for posting this.
There are 3 ideas there, but none for our cause.
I am no pro on these, but may be we could get an idea inserted for our cause and get enough votes on it.
Thanks for posting this.
more...
doshhar
10-07 03:28 PM
Please update your case if you have applied on July 2nd at NSC and your case got transferred to TSC later..
I am in the same situation and last week I got my receipt numbers from TSC. No updates has been seen on my receipt numbers..
I am in the same situation and last week I got my receipt numbers from TSC. No updates has been seen on my receipt numbers..
amitgeorge
04-11 03:40 AM
i like it.... but ... the color.... i think mud brown is not my color
more...
permfiling
05-18 11:09 AM
If new position is similar in responsibilities, then no effect. but if the responsibilities are changing, I would recommend talking to your immigration lawyer about it
My LC and I-140 was approved with my ex-employer in CA.Now I have a oppurtunity to join my ex-employer in the east coast. Will I be able to file AOS if I join in a similar role and when my PD becomes current ? The immigration lawyer of my ex-employer told me that I have to join in the same location as my LC was approved to take advantage of AOS as it is location specific. Is it true?
Thanks
Member of north calif
dontation : $500
My LC and I-140 was approved with my ex-employer in CA.Now I have a oppurtunity to join my ex-employer in the east coast. Will I be able to file AOS if I join in a similar role and when my PD becomes current ? The immigration lawyer of my ex-employer told me that I have to join in the same location as my LC was approved to take advantage of AOS as it is location specific. Is it true?
Thanks
Member of north calif
dontation : $500
2010 princess diana wedding dress
arrarrgee
07-18 09:18 AM
Can somebody file 140/485 if labor is approved today July 18th based on the new directive? How about future Labor approvals, say August 5th? Could somebody plz throw some light on this?
more...
raju3g
06-22 03:42 PM
receipt number will remain the same
hair Princess Diana#39;s wedding dress
richasamuel@yahoo.com
09-06 01:53 AM
Raise has nothing to do with GC processing.Decision of Raise Limit is set by employer and promotion does comes with change in job description.Keep one thing in mind Corporations make profit out of everybody whether its customers or employees doesnt matter.Corporations exists to make profits.by the way do you work for non-profit organization ?? in that case things are a little different based on finanicial availability.
Thanks,
Richa
Thanks,
Richa
more...
GC4US
06-11 01:47 AM
Hello everybody,
I just got an RFE for I-485...they are asking about marriage certificate and birth certificate...when I applied for I-485, I sent marriage certificate and birth certificate ..why they are asking me again to send?
And can you tell me please what to do with the following.......Uscis sent me too an envelope where to put my documents for RFE.......but the docs dont fit in the small envelope...is it ok if I put my docs in a different and bigger envelope?
My PD is sept 2005 ROW.
If someone faced the same situation please help me with some advice.
Thanks in advance
I just got an RFE for I-485...they are asking about marriage certificate and birth certificate...when I applied for I-485, I sent marriage certificate and birth certificate ..why they are asking me again to send?
And can you tell me please what to do with the following.......Uscis sent me too an envelope where to put my documents for RFE.......but the docs dont fit in the small envelope...is it ok if I put my docs in a different and bigger envelope?
My PD is sept 2005 ROW.
If someone faced the same situation please help me with some advice.
Thanks in advance
hot princess diana wedding dress
meridiani.planum
03-13 11:53 AM
My priority date is in Oct 2005 (ROW) and yesterday was the 180th day after filing my I-485 application. I need some help in deciding if I should wait for the green card with my current employer or think of changing the job using AC21. Your suggestions will be really helpful.
Thanks.
check the next VB (should be out in a day or two). Based on a thread where someone found the dates from the Mumbai consulate website, EB-3 ROW might move to July 2005. if it does, it might be worthwhile hanging on a couple of more months to this job and see if you become current.
On the othe rhand if you get a really nice offer, jump. AC-21 only adds a bit of complication to your job, it does not prevent you from getting a GC.
Thanks.
check the next VB (should be out in a day or two). Based on a thread where someone found the dates from the Mumbai consulate website, EB-3 ROW might move to July 2005. if it does, it might be worthwhile hanging on a couple of more months to this job and see if you become current.
On the othe rhand if you get a really nice offer, jump. AC-21 only adds a bit of complication to your job, it does not prevent you from getting a GC.
more...
house Princess Diana wedding dress
meenu_a
03-30 04:26 PM
Hello,
I am really having sleepless nights over this, thinking obsessively over and over.
Here is my situation:
I am working for a consulting company A since Feb 2003, and they filed for my GC in May 2003 in Ohio for a position. Even though I been working for the same company, I am working for a different position in California, and I never worked for the position in OHIO that is on GC Labor.
Now, its been two years I filed my 485, got EAD and everything. After 180 days of 485, my employer asked me to work on EAD (to avoid extending H-1). So now I am officially on EAD and used AP once.
At this time, my contract is coming to an end, can I look for another full time in CA area and use Ac-21 to port.? Is there any issue because even though I am working for the sponsoring employer, but not for the position on GC labor?
Or shall I not file AC-21, take a different job and come back to the sponsoring employer and work for that position upon GC approval? Or is that out of question because I already used EAD that means automatic invocation of AC-21?
Please suggest. Thanks
I am really having sleepless nights over this, thinking obsessively over and over.
Here is my situation:
I am working for a consulting company A since Feb 2003, and they filed for my GC in May 2003 in Ohio for a position. Even though I been working for the same company, I am working for a different position in California, and I never worked for the position in OHIO that is on GC Labor.
Now, its been two years I filed my 485, got EAD and everything. After 180 days of 485, my employer asked me to work on EAD (to avoid extending H-1). So now I am officially on EAD and used AP once.
At this time, my contract is coming to an end, can I look for another full time in CA area and use Ac-21 to port.? Is there any issue because even though I am working for the sponsoring employer, but not for the position on GC labor?
Or shall I not file AC-21, take a different job and come back to the sponsoring employer and work for that position upon GC approval? Or is that out of question because I already used EAD that means automatic invocation of AC-21?
Please suggest. Thanks
tattoo The gown was worn by a
meridiani.planum
03-02 11:58 PM
Hello, I am on H1B with an employer with dates from sep 2005 to sep 2008. I am amending my petition (with a new lca) as well as extending it for the same company. The amendment date will be from April 1st.
Now my question is shd my extension (with amendment) be from April 2008 to April 2011 or can it be for the remainder of 6 years that is April 2011 to Sep 2011. Please let me know. Thanks
upto april 2011. This is a bit like transferring your H1 after you complete 2.5 years with some employer: you get 3 more years, not 3.5. H1 extensions/filings/transfers are always <= 3 years.
Now my question is shd my extension (with amendment) be from April 2008 to April 2011 or can it be for the remainder of 6 years that is April 2011 to Sep 2011. Please let me know. Thanks
upto april 2011. This is a bit like transferring your H1 after you complete 2.5 years with some employer: you get 3 more years, not 3.5. H1 extensions/filings/transfers are always <= 3 years.
more...
pictures images Diana Wedding Gown
ita
11-01 01:44 PM
At the time of filing my application I just used one address.
Somehow I didn't know you could use Permanent address and current address.
I'm not sure but I guess my lawyer didn't file G325 form.
Is filing G325 form something mandatory ?
I've moved recently.
I want to change the address now but want to give a new address (which is not the address I moved to .)
Should it be fine?
Thank you.
Somehow I didn't know you could use Permanent address and current address.
I'm not sure but I guess my lawyer didn't file G325 form.
Is filing G325 form something mandatory ?
I've moved recently.
I want to change the address now but want to give a new address (which is not the address I moved to .)
Should it be fine?
Thank you.
dresses hairstyles Princess Diana#39;s wedding dress princess diana wedding dress
maximus777
08-26 12:47 PM
and this
Home is where the brain is | San Francisco online (http://www.sanfranmag.com/story/home-where-brain)
It goes straight up anti's a**
Excellent article. I am sure most of us who came in as grad/undergrad students to the US have similar experiences.
Home is where the brain is | San Francisco online (http://www.sanfranmag.com/story/home-where-brain)
It goes straight up anti's a**
Excellent article. I am sure most of us who came in as grad/undergrad students to the US have similar experiences.
more...
makeup Diana had only recently asked
maheshf
08-15 04:53 PM
Thanks..my understanding was..i am not Abondoning H! unless i use EAD for my new employment.
Not sure though. I will be working for new emplyer not the one that applied for GC.
Not sure though. I will be working for new emplyer not the one that applied for GC.
girlfriend Princess Diana#39;s Spare Wedding
ChainReaction
09-06 09:21 AM
I had filed my I485 directly at TSC , the address which was listed on my I140 Receipt on June 25th as per the advise given by IO when i called the 800#
Texas Service Center
P.O Box 851488 Dept A
Mesquite TX75185-1488
I still haven't received a receipt and the checks has not been cashed . I would like to know if anyone else filed their application at the address listed above and have received a receipt notice ?:confused:
Texas Service Center
P.O Box 851488 Dept A
Mesquite TX75185-1488
I still haven't received a receipt and the checks has not been cashed . I would like to know if anyone else filed their application at the address listed above and have received a receipt notice ?:confused:
hairstyles princess diana wedding dress
gk_2000
11-05 04:46 PM
There are easily 100000 of us here in the line. If we are all given GC's would it work in the national interest?
Specifically, there are three tests for national interest. Refer to this link for a more comprehensive explanation:
Miller Mayer - National Interest Waivers (http://www.millermayer.com/Immigration/ImmigrantVisas/NationalInterestWaiver/NationalInterestWaivers/tabid/224/Default.aspx)
1: Work of "Substantive Intrinsic merit": Basically any work is bound to have some merit, and can probably be quantified to prove that it is potentially worth billions
2: National in scope: Any work done that can be replicated all over the country and benefit a lot of people, or applied everywhere
3: Applicant should be more productive than his colleagues
Collectively, do we meet these criteria? Point by point:
1. Gather details of each and every one's project, past and present, and state the intrinsic merits
2. Include explanations on how the projects and technologies, if or when applied globally, would make a difference
3. Maybe, if you have an approved labor, this can be taken care of
And if we include all of our applications as one, and mention the economic benefits of our migrating, and submit a single application, or several as a whole, do we stand a chance of getting approved for a GC based on National Interest Waiver?
In principle, do you believe that our immigration is in the national interest?
Specifically, there are three tests for national interest. Refer to this link for a more comprehensive explanation:
Miller Mayer - National Interest Waivers (http://www.millermayer.com/Immigration/ImmigrantVisas/NationalInterestWaiver/NationalInterestWaivers/tabid/224/Default.aspx)
1: Work of "Substantive Intrinsic merit": Basically any work is bound to have some merit, and can probably be quantified to prove that it is potentially worth billions
2: National in scope: Any work done that can be replicated all over the country and benefit a lot of people, or applied everywhere
3: Applicant should be more productive than his colleagues
Collectively, do we meet these criteria? Point by point:
1. Gather details of each and every one's project, past and present, and state the intrinsic merits
2. Include explanations on how the projects and technologies, if or when applied globally, would make a difference
3. Maybe, if you have an approved labor, this can be taken care of
And if we include all of our applications as one, and mention the economic benefits of our migrating, and submit a single application, or several as a whole, do we stand a chance of getting approved for a GC based on National Interest Waiver?
In principle, do you believe that our immigration is in the national interest?
fromnaija
07-12 01:46 PM
You can use either the current edition of 06/05/2008 since that's the version on USCIS web site or use the older version until July 31, 2008. From August 1, 2008 you MUST use the 06/05/08 edition only. I am sure your doctor will have the older edition.
Blog Feeds
03-24 09:40 AM
AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:
The Center for American Progress released a report detailing the actual cost of the only solution proposed by anti-immigration restrictionists--Mass Deportation. In "The Costs of Mass Deportation (http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2010/03/deportation_cost.html),"Marshal Fitz, Gebe Martinez and Madura Wijewardena have put together a realistic appraisal of the costs of the only option other than comprehensive immigration reform. It is not a pretty picture. With costs over 5 years of $285 BILLION dollars (money which most folks understand that we do not have), we are faced with what appears to be an easy choice.
One, bring 12 million people out of the shadow economy and into the light. Allow them to pay taxes. Allow them to drive without fear. Allow them to live with their families. Allow them to generate wealth in the greatest economic engine ever created by man, the U.S. economy. Change our legal immigration system to eliminate outrageous non-immigrant and immigrant visa delays and encourage the immigration to the U.S. of the best and the brightest.
Or, two, deport everyone who had the courage to try to make it in America, even without a visa or status. Keep legal immigration restricted and strangle the economy, innovation, and motivation. Create fear and panic in immigrant communities, both legal and undocumented. Unmotivate immigrant youth to excel in school. Do everything in your power to cause distrust of lawful enforcement authority in immigrant communities.
These are your choices Congress. These are your choices Mr. President. Which will you have the courage to pursue and change?
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-5480778243706963683?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2010/03/deporting-them-all-costly-ineffective.html)
The Center for American Progress released a report detailing the actual cost of the only solution proposed by anti-immigration restrictionists--Mass Deportation. In "The Costs of Mass Deportation (http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2010/03/deportation_cost.html),"Marshal Fitz, Gebe Martinez and Madura Wijewardena have put together a realistic appraisal of the costs of the only option other than comprehensive immigration reform. It is not a pretty picture. With costs over 5 years of $285 BILLION dollars (money which most folks understand that we do not have), we are faced with what appears to be an easy choice.
One, bring 12 million people out of the shadow economy and into the light. Allow them to pay taxes. Allow them to drive without fear. Allow them to live with their families. Allow them to generate wealth in the greatest economic engine ever created by man, the U.S. economy. Change our legal immigration system to eliminate outrageous non-immigrant and immigrant visa delays and encourage the immigration to the U.S. of the best and the brightest.
Or, two, deport everyone who had the courage to try to make it in America, even without a visa or status. Keep legal immigration restricted and strangle the economy, innovation, and motivation. Create fear and panic in immigrant communities, both legal and undocumented. Unmotivate immigrant youth to excel in school. Do everything in your power to cause distrust of lawful enforcement authority in immigrant communities.
These are your choices Congress. These are your choices Mr. President. Which will you have the courage to pursue and change?
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-5480778243706963683?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2010/03/deporting-them-all-costly-ineffective.html)
No comments:
Post a Comment