feedfront
09-17 09:55 AM
I have not seen this situation with anybody else on forum. Talk to good attorney, they should help you out.
RFE is time sensitive. So act fast.
Good Luck!
RFE is time sensitive. So act fast.
Good Luck!
wallpaper About the kiss with Emma:
hibworker
02-04 04:54 PM
If the question didn't showed up - then it has been removed. Its as simple as that - isn't it. The question cannot magically show up for some and not for others.
Take it easy! Good luck with your interview.
Take it easy! Good luck with your interview.
ewapu
03-11 08:15 PM
hey i got 2nd one from the NSC. Is it happening with many people??
wat r the chances if handled carefully???
please share your advice nd experiences. thanks a lot
wat r the chances if handled carefully???
please share your advice nd experiences. thanks a lot
2011 Ron amp; Hermione forever Deathly
Blog Feeds
09-18 10:20 AM
AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:
There has been a lot of talk recently about what might be included in an immigration reform bill. Will there be a legalization/amnesty/forgiveness of "lawbreakers" rule? Will there be an expansion of employment based and family based immigrant visa numbers to solve the economically devastating backlogs we currently deal with? Will there be a mandatory E-Verify component? Will there be an interior enforcement focus? Will there be even more fences?
The topic that seems to be lost in all this speculation is something I consider to be the overriding component of reform--the Key to holding a reform package together. I am speaking, of course, of Due Process Restoration. Anyone who deals with immigrants for any length of time is intimately familiar with the disaster that is our immigration enforcement system. It is not just that previous administrations have done a horrific job at the enforcement that should have been taking place, but rather, the missing component to that enforcement. When is the last time an ICE officer worried about Due Process considerations? What is really destroying immigrant families--how about 212(a)(9)(B) and (C)? What about the concept of "civil" detention in real jails with real criminals for non-criminal immigrants? What about the detention of Asylum Seekers? What about the ludicrous requirements of REAL ID for asylum seekers?
These are all only a few of the regular violations of concepts most American hold sacred. When you tell the 'average' American about the system immigrants actually have to deal with, most are appropriately appalled. It is to those Americans that we must speak. I believe that if Senator Schumer has the courage to include Due Process Restoration in his "Comprehensive" immigration reform bill, it will be tragically necessary for us to defend these Due Process provisions of the reform package.
Take a look at this video, and sign up to support including Due Process Restoration in a comprehensive immigration reform bill.
Restore Fairness: bring back due process to the immigration system (http://vimeo.com/6200660) from Breakthrough (http://vimeo.com/letsbreakthrough) on Vimeo (http://vimeo.com/).
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-7017328086435157158?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/09/due-process-restoration-now.html)
There has been a lot of talk recently about what might be included in an immigration reform bill. Will there be a legalization/amnesty/forgiveness of "lawbreakers" rule? Will there be an expansion of employment based and family based immigrant visa numbers to solve the economically devastating backlogs we currently deal with? Will there be a mandatory E-Verify component? Will there be an interior enforcement focus? Will there be even more fences?
The topic that seems to be lost in all this speculation is something I consider to be the overriding component of reform--the Key to holding a reform package together. I am speaking, of course, of Due Process Restoration. Anyone who deals with immigrants for any length of time is intimately familiar with the disaster that is our immigration enforcement system. It is not just that previous administrations have done a horrific job at the enforcement that should have been taking place, but rather, the missing component to that enforcement. When is the last time an ICE officer worried about Due Process considerations? What is really destroying immigrant families--how about 212(a)(9)(B) and (C)? What about the concept of "civil" detention in real jails with real criminals for non-criminal immigrants? What about the detention of Asylum Seekers? What about the ludicrous requirements of REAL ID for asylum seekers?
These are all only a few of the regular violations of concepts most American hold sacred. When you tell the 'average' American about the system immigrants actually have to deal with, most are appropriately appalled. It is to those Americans that we must speak. I believe that if Senator Schumer has the courage to include Due Process Restoration in his "Comprehensive" immigration reform bill, it will be tragically necessary for us to defend these Due Process provisions of the reform package.
Take a look at this video, and sign up to support including Due Process Restoration in a comprehensive immigration reform bill.
Restore Fairness: bring back due process to the immigration system (http://vimeo.com/6200660) from Breakthrough (http://vimeo.com/letsbreakthrough) on Vimeo (http://vimeo.com/).
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-7017328086435157158?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/09/due-process-restoration-now.html)
more...
tinamatthew
07-21 10:33 AM
In the 485 filings for me and my wife, my divorce certificate for my previous marriage was put in my files but it should have been with my wife's file per 485 intruction because she is the derivative applicant. If USCIS can't find it in my wife's file, will USCIS look for it in my file since we filed together?
If this is not required as initial evidence then they will issue an RFE and then you can send the documents later.
To fix the problem, could we resubmit my wife's 485 now and withdraw the one just submitted even though we don't have the receipt for it yet? or should we wait until we get receipt for the one just submitted and then resubmit her 485 application when my PD become current again? or could we just submit the missing file after we get the receipt and my PD becomes current?
Don't resubmit your wife's application, wait for a receipt
Your help is greatly appreciated.
Hope this helps
If this is not required as initial evidence then they will issue an RFE and then you can send the documents later.
To fix the problem, could we resubmit my wife's 485 now and withdraw the one just submitted even though we don't have the receipt for it yet? or should we wait until we get receipt for the one just submitted and then resubmit her 485 application when my PD become current again? or could we just submit the missing file after we get the receipt and my PD becomes current?
Don't resubmit your wife's application, wait for a receipt
Your help is greatly appreciated.
Hope this helps
just_waiting
01-04 09:50 AM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/03/AR2007010301678.html
Immigrants a Driving Force Behind Start-Ups, Study Says
Tech Industry Clamors to Get More Visas for Foreign Workers
By Krissah Williams
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, January 4, 2007; Page D05
About 25 percent of the technology and engineering companies launched in the past decade had at least one foreign-born founder, according to a study released yesterday that throws new information into the debate over foreign workers who arrive in the United States on specialty visas.
Immigrants a Driving Force Behind Start-Ups, Study Says
Tech Industry Clamors to Get More Visas for Foreign Workers
By Krissah Williams
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, January 4, 2007; Page D05
About 25 percent of the technology and engineering companies launched in the past decade had at least one foreign-born founder, according to a study released yesterday that throws new information into the debate over foreign workers who arrive in the United States on specialty visas.
more...
prom2
10-02 08:59 PM
If you have a copy of filled-up I-131, look at question 5 in part 3 in the 2nd page. That will tell you where the AP document will be sent.
Admins:
Please close this thread also.
That question 5 should not responded if you are applying for AP.
Read the note below question 3.
Admins:
Please close this thread also.
That question 5 should not responded if you are applying for AP.
Read the note below question 3.
2010 First off: there is a video
kak1978
01-04 09:57 AM
Bump.
more...
singhsa3
02-09 08:30 PM
My passport is expiring in March. I live in NY metro . Does anyone knows the procedure to renew the passport while in the USA. Please share your experience.
hair Emma and Rupert as
freddyCR
January 31st, 2005, 09:16 PM
thanks ;)
more...
casinoroyale
07-01 11:39 AM
Is PD porting allowed without ever working for the future employer who got I-140 approved? Is this still possible if the future employer revokes the I-140 because employee does not intend to join them?
hot emma watson kissing daniel
rajuk_in
07-02 04:23 PM
Hi,
I am planning to file my I-485 and for that I got my Birth Certificate from India and have a question related to it. The name provided for my Passport and all other documents is "Rajendra Upadhya Kumbhasi" but in my Birth Certificate they have included my father's name along with my name i.e. my Birth Certificate has "Rajendra Murlidhar Upadhya Kumbhasi". I would like to know if this could be a issue and if so will a affidavit help me resolve this issue.
Please let me know.
Regards,
Raj
I am planning to file my I-485 and for that I got my Birth Certificate from India and have a question related to it. The name provided for my Passport and all other documents is "Rajendra Upadhya Kumbhasi" but in my Birth Certificate they have included my father's name along with my name i.e. my Birth Certificate has "Rajendra Murlidhar Upadhya Kumbhasi". I would like to know if this could be a issue and if so will a affidavit help me resolve this issue.
Please let me know.
Regards,
Raj
more...
house Daniel Radcliffe: #39;Emma Watson
sanjay02
05-31 02:58 PM
Hi
When renewing EAD paper filing not E-file, I had written the check in favor of USCIS instead of "U.S.Department of Homeland security" , do you think there would be a issue for them to accept the cheque?
Thnks
When renewing EAD paper filing not E-file, I had written the check in favor of USCIS instead of "U.S.Department of Homeland security" , do you think there would be a issue for them to accept the cheque?
Thnks
tattoo Radcliffe and Emma Watson
InTheMoment
08-13 10:32 AM
Admin....how about closing this thread..please.
Lets create new thread for every application received by every different person and track each of them ....
Why can't we spend some time on DC rally and do something productive then tracking who received your application..
Lets create new thread for every application received by every different person and track each of them ....
Why can't we spend some time on DC rally and do something productive then tracking who received your application..
more...
pictures New on DVD Radcliffe, Watson
GC_LOOKIN
12-11 09:56 PM
there is another LUD on my 485 today, continuosly from the last 4 working days Dec6th,7th,10th and today(11th)..not sure what's going on...:confused:
dresses Emma Watson says kissing
Ann Ruben
02-01 09:25 PM
As you probably realize, by transferring to another employer you will have to start the GC process all over--though you should be able to keep your May 2008 priority date.
Based on the facts you have provided, I would say that it is unlikely your prospective employer's H-1 would be denied. However, there is never any guarantee. Premium processing usually takes 7-10 days if there is no RFE, but again, there can be no guarantee. (Note that USCIS must refund the $1000 fee if your case is not acted on (approval, denial, or RFE) within 15 days of receipt.)
Based on the facts you have provided, I would say that it is unlikely your prospective employer's H-1 would be denied. However, there is never any guarantee. Premium processing usually takes 7-10 days if there is no RFE, but again, there can be no guarantee. (Note that USCIS must refund the $1000 fee if your case is not acted on (approval, denial, or RFE) within 15 days of receipt.)
more...
makeup The world may think Emma
amitnaik
08-22 04:44 PM
Here are the details:
Working with an employer since 2001, EB 3 PD Dec 2003, EAD in 2007, Still on H1b until Nov 10. Though had two masters i had filed under EB 3 (no one to balim it was just me...Small Company, not so called HR department and hired not so high profile/deligent lawyer (later found out that he was busy moving from west to east coast)
With the same employer, i have rec'd EB 2 approval, want to file I 140 and port EB 3 PD.
Need help/input with folloiwng from the gurus:
1) in EB 3 application the title is "Construction Engineer" with 4 lines of scope of work clarification with bachelors degree in civil engg. and no experience requirement. In EB 2 application, we have used same title "Construction Engineer" with 4 lines of scope of work, we had left 2 lines common (as earlier in EB3 application) and 2 new lines (related to environmental engg. since i have two env. engg. masters with BE in civil engg.)......this ad asked for MS in env. engg. or similar degree with no experience requirement.
Question: EB 2 Labor is approved, i am not sure what they check with i 140 application but does above sound reasonable (not that anything can be changed...but asking for an opinion here).
2) With premium processing, how long it takes to get I140 approved?
3) Do we just file for I 140 for EB 2 first, get it approved and then file letter/application ( i don't know the procedure/protocol) asking to port PD OR do we need file some sort of paper work with I140 to port PD.
Appreciate your help.
Thanks in advance.
Working with an employer since 2001, EB 3 PD Dec 2003, EAD in 2007, Still on H1b until Nov 10. Though had two masters i had filed under EB 3 (no one to balim it was just me...Small Company, not so called HR department and hired not so high profile/deligent lawyer (later found out that he was busy moving from west to east coast)
With the same employer, i have rec'd EB 2 approval, want to file I 140 and port EB 3 PD.
Need help/input with folloiwng from the gurus:
1) in EB 3 application the title is "Construction Engineer" with 4 lines of scope of work clarification with bachelors degree in civil engg. and no experience requirement. In EB 2 application, we have used same title "Construction Engineer" with 4 lines of scope of work, we had left 2 lines common (as earlier in EB3 application) and 2 new lines (related to environmental engg. since i have two env. engg. masters with BE in civil engg.)......this ad asked for MS in env. engg. or similar degree with no experience requirement.
Question: EB 2 Labor is approved, i am not sure what they check with i 140 application but does above sound reasonable (not that anything can be changed...but asking for an opinion here).
2) With premium processing, how long it takes to get I140 approved?
3) Do we just file for I 140 for EB 2 first, get it approved and then file letter/application ( i don't know the procedure/protocol) asking to port PD OR do we need file some sort of paper work with I140 to port PD.
Appreciate your help.
Thanks in advance.
girlfriend Emma-Daniel Kiss
gc_chahiye
10-24 04:01 PM
Can anyone please share info on conversion of EB3 to EB2 after applying for 485 ?. Our lawyer now suggests that they cant apply for EB2 and they have to revoke EB3 application.. Is this applicable to even apply for EB2 labor and subsequent I140. I thought we need to revoke 485 only when we are about to apply for new 485. Also, please let me know if we can apply for EB2 when you are in EAD status and has not invoked AC21. Sorry, if this question was already answered in the forum.
you can start a new LC in EB2 anytime, irrespective of whether you are in EAD, h1, AC21, in the country, outside the country, travelling in space. No restrictions...
The only risk with what you are trying to do is if you try to file EB2 for the same position for which you had earlier filed in EB3 (ie. job duties and position are the same) you can get queries from USCIS about it. Make sure this position (or job duties) are different. Search the mesage boards, this topic has been discussed earlier
you can start a new LC in EB2 anytime, irrespective of whether you are in EAD, h1, AC21, in the country, outside the country, travelling in space. No restrictions...
The only risk with what you are trying to do is if you try to file EB2 for the same position for which you had earlier filed in EB3 (ie. job duties and position are the same) you can get queries from USCIS about it. Make sure this position (or job duties) are different. Search the mesage boards, this topic has been discussed earlier
hairstyles Harry Potter and the deathly
indo_obama
05-12 10:31 AM
I think he has to give some BDS exam first to get a scroe and then using that he should be able to apply to various colleges. The course fees is about $200,000 . So if you can get admission somewhere and can pay the fees then he can be minting money soon:D
uma001
10-30 05:17 PM
How can they ask W2 for all years. Nobody keep W2 for more than 3 years. That what they recomments usually. They used to askf or only 3 years of W2. I never heard anything like this. If they start asking for all W2s, then 90% won't get green cards. They are making life miserable for grene card aspirants
rameshvaid
09-16 03:12 PM
^^^^^^^^^b^^^^^^u^^^^^^^^m^^^^^^^^^^^^p..
To many bumps foR EB - 3..
To many bumps foR EB - 3..
No comments:
Post a Comment