BumbleBee
08-15 01:41 PM
Yes lonemetro,
You can re-use priority date established on first I-140 for any sub-sequent I-140 filling. As I understand from your post, you have EB3 labor approved and have just filed for I-140 based on it.
Now, parent company wants to transfer you. Generally I would think you should be able to transfer and still have your GC process going if the company indeed is a 'parent company' but seems there is something different here.
As a general rule, as long as your previously approved I-140 remained approved, you can re-use priority date established for that I-140 for any subsequent I-140 petition. The sub-sequent petition can be with any employer, and yes, you would need a new labor to file that new I-140 :)
Try EB1 or EB2 this time :cool:
BumbleBee
You can re-use priority date established on first I-140 for any sub-sequent I-140 filling. As I understand from your post, you have EB3 labor approved and have just filed for I-140 based on it.
Now, parent company wants to transfer you. Generally I would think you should be able to transfer and still have your GC process going if the company indeed is a 'parent company' but seems there is something different here.
As a general rule, as long as your previously approved I-140 remained approved, you can re-use priority date established for that I-140 for any subsequent I-140 petition. The sub-sequent petition can be with any employer, and yes, you would need a new labor to file that new I-140 :)
Try EB1 or EB2 this time :cool:
BumbleBee
wallpaper rachel-weisz.jpg 08-Jul-2009
vinabath
04-02 01:46 PM
No. My file was picked in Feb 1st week.
jkays94
06-21 06:46 PM
Thanks for reply
How can I find was it for misdemeanor or battery or felony?
I-485 part III would require you to answer 'yes' to the following question:
Have you ever, in or outside the United States:
been arrested, cited, charged, indicted, fined or imprisoned for breaking or violating any law or ordinance, excluding traffic violations?
Your best bet would be to conduct a background check in your state to see if it shows up on your record. You might want to consult a lawyer to see if this shows up in police or other records as well. Ironically I recently heard of a lawyer who recently advised someone to answer no to the question for a DWI since it was a 'traffic violation'. Note that if you answer yes you have the opportunity to explain on a separate piece of paper.
How can I find was it for misdemeanor or battery or felony?
I-485 part III would require you to answer 'yes' to the following question:
Have you ever, in or outside the United States:
been arrested, cited, charged, indicted, fined or imprisoned for breaking or violating any law or ordinance, excluding traffic violations?
Your best bet would be to conduct a background check in your state to see if it shows up on your record. You might want to consult a lawyer to see if this shows up in police or other records as well. Ironically I recently heard of a lawyer who recently advised someone to answer no to the question for a DWI since it was a 'traffic violation'. Note that if you answer yes you have the opportunity to explain on a separate piece of paper.
2011 Rachel Weisz#39;s O Face
ramus
05-14 08:30 AM
How much money would anybody able to spend for this kind of law-suit?
more...
instantkarma
01-29 08:55 AM
Thank you for the response.
The salary on Labor is mentioned as $76k. At the time of renewing EAD and AP every year it is at $90k. Since, salary increased after filing GC within the same company.
With AP portability a lot of advisors say, salary shouldnt be a concern rather job duties are.
The salary on Labor is mentioned as $76k. At the time of renewing EAD and AP every year it is at $90k. Since, salary increased after filing GC within the same company.
With AP portability a lot of advisors say, salary shouldnt be a concern rather job duties are.
harrydr
04-30 12:51 AM
If i'm from Michigan, which processing center is handling my application for Green Card. Nebraska??????????????
more...
surabhi
11-06 09:40 AM
Anyone out there knows the answer?
I am currently working for Company A which sponsors my H1B. I wonder if I can work for another company on a part time basis. What's the requirement for concurrent H1B filing? And does concurrent H1B filing requires a new H1B application against the quota? Please provide guidance.
YOu can get second H1 for part-time. Ensure that the hours are correctly represented. New h1B will not be against quota. Review the I-129 application form. You will realize under what circumstances will you come under quota.
I am currently working for Company A which sponsors my H1B. I wonder if I can work for another company on a part time basis. What's the requirement for concurrent H1B filing? And does concurrent H1B filing requires a new H1B application against the quota? Please provide guidance.
YOu can get second H1 for part-time. Ensure that the hours are correctly represented. New h1B will not be against quota. Review the I-129 application form. You will realize under what circumstances will you come under quota.
2010 Rachel Weisz
kirupa
06-21 03:04 PM
You interpreted it correctly and your entry flies very nicely under the guidelines! :)
more...
gc??
04-22 01:39 PM
I went for my AOS interview, everything seemed ok, officer said everything looks ok and he doesnt see any reason why i should not be approved, he however said that he needs to get the FBI clearance background check and that i should get my conditional PR card in the mail, he then stamped on my entrance visa " Cancelled without Prejudice" stamp, I am worried, what does this mean? The word cancel and everything ok does not seem right. Can someone help me please?
hair Rachel Weisz, icono lésbico
kalia
07-10 10:51 AM
The American Immigration Law Foundation (AILF) has decided to forge ahead to file the class action lawsuit, as previously mentioned on MurthyDotCom.
AILF seeks plaintiffs who have been affected by the July 2, 2007 actions of the USCIS and the U.S. Department of State, which have resulted in an inability of most employment-based applicants to file their I-485 (Adjustment of Status) applications during July 2007.
For those who wish to participate as plaintiffs in this class action lawsuit, AILF has prepared and we attach the following documents, all of them showing a revision date of July 9, 2007.
1. Questionnaire for Potential Plaintiffs
2. Retainer Agreement with AILF
3. FAQs on the Visa Bulletin Availability
Please review each of these documents carefully. Read them more than once until you are familiar with the issues and concepts.
At this stage, AILF is seeking, as plaintiffs, individuals who are suffering some particular or unusual harm, and requests that they respond. These individuals could help to highlight the problems created by the government.
Who is Covered by this Potential Class Action Lawsuit?
1. It is not essential to participate or submit one's name to AILF to be considered a plaintiff of this class action lawsuit. If a person has/had filed the I-485 during July 2007, then AILF believes that those people should be covered by the lawsuit to take advantage of the potential benefits of a successful lawsuit.
2. Even those who decided not to file the I-485 during July 2007 MAY be eligible if the judge agrees to include them as plaintiffs in the lawsuit. AILF made a decision later on to try to include them also as an injured class. However, AILF believes that their remedies may be different than those who actually filed the I-485 during July 2007.
See the amended FAQ for more information, and fill out the potential plaintiff questionnaire and retainer agreement. All are PDFs.
Those who are interested please click https://www.murthy.com/ailf_lawsuit.html
and follow the direction.
Thanks
AILF seeks plaintiffs who have been affected by the July 2, 2007 actions of the USCIS and the U.S. Department of State, which have resulted in an inability of most employment-based applicants to file their I-485 (Adjustment of Status) applications during July 2007.
For those who wish to participate as plaintiffs in this class action lawsuit, AILF has prepared and we attach the following documents, all of them showing a revision date of July 9, 2007.
1. Questionnaire for Potential Plaintiffs
2. Retainer Agreement with AILF
3. FAQs on the Visa Bulletin Availability
Please review each of these documents carefully. Read them more than once until you are familiar with the issues and concepts.
At this stage, AILF is seeking, as plaintiffs, individuals who are suffering some particular or unusual harm, and requests that they respond. These individuals could help to highlight the problems created by the government.
Who is Covered by this Potential Class Action Lawsuit?
1. It is not essential to participate or submit one's name to AILF to be considered a plaintiff of this class action lawsuit. If a person has/had filed the I-485 during July 2007, then AILF believes that those people should be covered by the lawsuit to take advantage of the potential benefits of a successful lawsuit.
2. Even those who decided not to file the I-485 during July 2007 MAY be eligible if the judge agrees to include them as plaintiffs in the lawsuit. AILF made a decision later on to try to include them also as an injured class. However, AILF believes that their remedies may be different than those who actually filed the I-485 during July 2007.
See the amended FAQ for more information, and fill out the potential plaintiff questionnaire and retainer agreement. All are PDFs.
Those who are interested please click https://www.murthy.com/ailf_lawsuit.html
and follow the direction.
Thanks
more...
sent4dc
05-13 01:33 AM
I am not getting paid equivalent to what is there in my LC. Is there any problem to get approval of my I-458?The I-485 has nothing to do with your salary, it is the "Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status". It makes a difference for your I-140 application, though, but you will need to re-phrase your question then.
hot Babe # 107 – Rachel Weisz
RadioactveChimp
04-16 09:22 PM
shouldnt the i be small and the c be big?
HAHA
yeah he messed up and since he says the iMac is crap, I must smite him! just kidding :crazy:
HAHA
yeah he messed up and since he says the iMac is crap, I must smite him! just kidding :crazy:
more...
house (6330335) Rachel Weisz:
jliechty
June 5th, 2005, 07:06 PM
Yes, I like the "floating in air" effect.
I third that. :)
I third that. :)
tattoo Rachel Weisz
rajasush7174
10-13 04:26 PM
hi..i too would like to join in.. i stay in souderton, pa.. please let me know the details.. thanks a ton..
more...
pictures rachel weisz - FameCrawler
deepak
10-21 10:03 PM
Hate to be negative or a spoilsport. I am just as proud of this as any other Indian. But, is it too much to ask for, to have at least ONE of the three links on the page working? Is it too much to expect to have the video move beyond "buffering".
I know there probably isn't any link between this and a moon mission, but one would expect the page to look a bit decent and for something on that page to work. I really hope the people who built that page had nothing to do with the actual mission!
I know there probably isn't any link between this and a moon mission, but one would expect the page to look a bit decent and for something on that page to work. I really hope the people who built that page had nothing to do with the actual mission!
dresses Really naked Rachel Weisz
AjP
June 6th, 2005, 05:45 AM
really beautiful shot!!!!!!!!!!!! I like the 3d and little water drops on a rose. Great Shot!!!!