Thursday, June 9, 2011

nicole kidman australia

images Nicole Kidman arrived at the nicole kidman australia. HUgh Jackman and Nicole Kidman
  • HUgh Jackman and Nicole Kidman



  • Saralayar
    05-14 06:28 PM
    Hello friends,
    On May 01,2009 my wife's I-485 status changed online that they requested additinal evidence. I have not received RFE letter as of now and also I am touch base with my attorney, my attorney's office also not received RFE letter. Please advice me what steps I have to take in this regard.
    Please provide all your GC personal details in IV so that you will get better answers.





    wallpaper HUgh Jackman and Nicole Kidman nicole kidman australia. Nicole Kidman
  • Nicole Kidman



  • ronhira
    09-18 06:04 PM
    its not 800,000 its around 190,000 for all EB1,2,3
    look at here May 2010 data
    USCIS - Previous Pending Employment-Based I-485 Inventory (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.eb1d4c2a3e5b9ac89243c6a7543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=16551543455e5210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCR D&vgnextchannel=16551543455e5210VgnVCM100000082ca60a RCRD)

    that is the part of the problem...... uscis has never provided correct and complete size of the backlog..... if backlog size were to be 190,000 then the dates should get current in all of the eb1, eb2 and eb3 categories in around 1 year.... how many here expect the dates to be current for all categories in around 1 year? probably close to zero.... nevertheless, most people think that the size of the backlog is equal to the number of applicants ahead of them..... which is to say that those ahead in line for each one of us is the cause of the backlog and not part of the backlog.... and those behind us do not deserve to be counted with us..... perhaps they should just wait period...... this is the formula most people here seem to use to derive at the size of the backlog.... hence difference versions and different numbers for the size of the backlog.....





    nicole kidman australia. Nicole Kidman pushes #39;no
  • Nicole Kidman pushes #39;no



  • GCwaitforever
    02-09 05:50 PM
    If you could customize it to let people tell their own life stories, that would be great. I am mailing my letter tonight.


    To

    Mr. John Beverly
    Director, Foreign Labor Certification Program
    200 Constitution Ave NW, room C4312
    Washington, DC 20210

    Mr. Beverly,

    [Block A: Filler] with model text by the side ....
    [Model text:
    I am a ------ in one of the Fortune --- companies, with expertise in ---- field. I have about --- years of experience in the ------- field. I came to USA in ---- on a --- Visa. I hold ------ degree in --- from a premier Institute. My employer applied for -----(RIR/non-RIR), ---- (EB*), permanent labor certification in ---from ----- state. It reached ------ regional office in ------. My case is shipped to ----- (Dallas/Philadelphia) Backlog Center later and it is waiting for adjudication for the past ----- (one year). I have been waiting to apply for the green card for almost ---- (one-to-five) years now.]

    Block B:
    Based on information received from friends who received approvals at BEC, I see that the processing at the Backlog Elimination Centers has several problems.
     Dallas and Philadelphia follow different procedures (RIR versus TR, Regional versus SWA cases)
     FIFO has not been implemented correctly, as promised at the beginning of setting up these centers. For example, Dallas is approving cases from late 2004, while Philadelphia is approving random cases from 2002; the very reason for the creation of the BECs was to implement true nationwide FIFO order for labor certifications.
     There is a complete lack of transparency and answerability from a public agency like BEC.
     The BECs refuse to disclose how many people work in adjudication, how many cases have been adjudicated so far, how many cases are pending data entry, why certain states have more cases processed than others in random order, etc�
     The BECs refuse to implement a simple application on the internet where applicants could check their statuses online.
     The BECs refuse to disclose any future timeline, keeping 350,000 people in the dark as to what to expect and how long to wait.

    All I am expecting from the BECs is little bit of transparency and respect which I truly deserve. I really would like to know the happenings at BECs. I appreciate if you could answer these questions below.
     Why FIFO has not been implemented?
     How many people are working on adjudications?
     What are the criteria for picking up a case for processing?
     Why are there differences in procedures between Dallas and Philadelphia BECs?
     How many cases have been adjudicated so far?

    Block C:[Filler]
    [Model Text: Lack of information, long wait and continued slump in the career are creating lot of stress in my life. I can not change jobs. Any information from you would go a long way in assuaging these worries.]

    Respectfully,

    ------------------------------------------------
    xxxx





    2011 Nicole Kidman nicole kidman australia. Hugh Jackman and Nicole Kidman
  • Hugh Jackman and Nicole Kidman



  • gccube
    04-08 12:28 PM
    started the papar work with the attorney already.



    more...


    nicole kidman australia. 49) Australia
  • 49) Australia



  • gclabor07
    11-05 09:55 AM
    What an inspiring story. Our GC journey feels pale in comparison to the plight of poor, sick, and mentally ill people face in India.





    nicole kidman australia. Nicole Kidman stars in the new
  • Nicole Kidman stars in the new



  • chanduv23
    12-09 12:16 PM
    Guys,

    Right now there are 154 guests accessing this site...please become a member, join state chapter and please please contribute to IV..

    Guests please take a positive step and become a member. And once you become a member - please contribute. This goes a long way towards helping our cause.



    more...


    nicole kidman australia. Nicole Kidman On Set of
  • Nicole Kidman On Set of



  • subba
    12-13 07:41 PM
    I guess the 10 days is "time for pack up" technically.
    That is what the POE officer always stamped on my I94.

    I was driving to the US from Canada and got a new I-94 on the port of entry. Immigration officer put a date that was 10 days ahead of the expiry on my I-797 telling me that I would have 10 additional days post I-797 expiry to leave the country.

    Is this normal? Do I need the date changed on my I-94 to be the date I have on I-797? I would really appreciate your input on this.





    2010 Nicole Kidman pushes #39;no nicole kidman australia. Nicole Kidman arrived at the
  • Nicole Kidman arrived at the



  • Ramba
    05-01 11:42 AM
    Thats exactly my plan. It will be accompanied by covering letter, a spreadsheet and a recommendation.
    I will be sending mainly to DOS , DHS and USCIS

    First USCIS has no control or rights in visa allocation. It is 100% DOS job. I am not pesimistic, but it may not helpful. DOS under obligations, sets the cutoff dates in various catagories as per INA, its regulations and their SOP. Recommending some procedure is a major change for them. They have to verify whatever you recommend does not violate INA, and the regulations. Even ombudusman has not achived to modify the visa allocation procedure at DOS. Only thing you can do is, if you have any evidence that DOS is not following the INA or the regulation, you can bring to their notice. Thats all you can do.



    more...


    nicole kidman australia. Nicole Kidman atributes her
  • Nicole Kidman atributes her



  • Blog Feeds
    09-18 10:20 AM
    AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:


    https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhgI2Jd2ah-t10w7_E7jO92-jSKCpn_et2bB83GWeIIqgBuAS4D5etFYtw2mKeabTRN1PvLijaGJjIsJhB9VoXigRFLuz6sU-6M0pSlZI4ZqoWn3M6-ZkE_B59vBvDJ1WDQlyithejwsiY/s320/Wilson+Liar.jpg (https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhgI2Jd2ah-t10w7_E7jO92-jSKCpn_et2bB83GWeIIqgBuAS4D5etFYtw2mKeabTRN1PvLijaGJjIsJhB9VoXigRFLuz6sU-6M0pSlZI4ZqoWn3M6-ZkE_B59vBvDJ1WDQlyithejwsiY/s1600-h/Wilson+Liar.jpg)During President Obama's address to a joint session of Congress on Tuesday, Congressman Joe Wilson (R. SC), shouted "LIAR!" when President Obama stated that the proposed health care plan would not cover "illegal aliens." Now, Joe Wilson said he should know this because he once was an immigration lawyer (http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2009/09/rep-joe-wilson-speaks-to-rwv.html). Whether that meant immigration from or to South Carolina, I am not sure, but one thing is for sure, no one I know ever knew Joe Wilson the immigration lawyer. If by "immigration lawyer" Mr. Wilson meant that he once helped an immigrant get deported, I am not sure that really counts. But if "Joe the Immigration Lawyer" is like "Joe the Plumber," then maybe he thinks he really was one.

    After all, an immigration lawyer would likely be able to understand what exactly the law means when it says that only citizens and permanent residents are covered under the Obama plan. What has caused Joe Wilson to react like this, besides a serious lack of self control, is the provision in the proposed legislation that eliminates the requirement of using the "SAVE" system to verify whether someone who is an immigrant, is legally in the United States. Use of this program has stopped very few undocumented immigrants from getting public benefits, but has stopped literally thousands of U.S. citizens, mostly poor, from obtaining benefits because of their lack of accessible proof of their citizenship.

    Factcheck.org has presented a short article on Seven Falsehoods About Health Care (http://www.factcheck.org/2009/08/seven-falsehoods-about-health-care/). One of those applies directly to this point:

    False: Illegal Immigrants Will Be Covered. One Republican congressman issued
    a press release claiming that "5,600,000 Illegal Aliens May Be Covered Under Obamacare (http://steveking.house.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Newsroom.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=a294b300-19b9-b4b1-1296-659af869849a&Region_id=&Issue_id=)," and we�ve been peppered with queries about similar claims. They�re not true. In fact, the House bill (the only bill to be formally introduced in its entirety) specifically says that no federal money would be spent on giving illegal immigrants health coverage:

    H.R. 3200: Sec 246 � NO FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS. Nothing in this subtitle shall allow Federal payments for affordability credits on behalf of individuals who are not lawfully present in the United States.

    Also, under current law, those in the country illegally don�t qualify for federal health programs. Of interest: About half of illegal immigrants have health insurance now, according to the nonpartisan Pew Hispanic Center, which says those who lack insurance do so principally because their employers don�t offer it."Misleading GOP Health Care Claims" (http://factcheck.org/2009/07/misleading-gop-health-care-claims/) July 23 � by Brooks Jackson, Viveca Novak, Lori Robertson and Jess Henig.


    I can certainly see both sides of the debate, and, frankly, neither side is being completely honest or clear. What is quite clear, is how immigration, and our broken immigration system, keeps coming up in the context of the debate of national agenda items, such as the health care debate.



    Several weeks ago I blogged on the danger that the tone of the Health care debate (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/08/healthcare-debate-and-immigration.html)had for the coming immigration reform debate. Calling the President a Liar during his speech to a joint session to Congress is Exhibit A in what we have in store for the coming debate. If Joe Wilson the Immigration Lawyer can misrepresent the consequences of legislative language as straight forward as these two particular sections, we have to be prepared for the extraordinary misrepresentations of any positive aspects of an immigration reform bill. Whether it is "amnesty," "rewarding law breakers," "open borders," "Liars," or even "destroyers of American culture" we have to understand how to phrase and present the response. Without a doubt, the response from those of us who understand the need to balance immigration reform, with security concerns, and with economic growth has to be not only vocal, but focused. We, as Real Immigration Lawyers, must know the language of the proposed legislation, we must know the myths that are out there, and we need to be vocal in our response.




    Next week, more than 40 talk radio hosts are descending on Capital Hill for the FAIR (http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=846)Annual Scare the Crap Out of Congress Boondoggle. The outrageous claims of the downfall of America caused by illegal immigration, along with similarly nutty myths will be presented as facts. Actual real news organization will cite the Center for Immigration Studies as a legitimate source of information. We must be prepared to call into our local radio stations, whose hosts are in D.C. next week, and be prepared to present the facts of immigration. Not by sugar coating the problems that are caused by illegal immigration, but rather by pointing out which specific laws are broken (INA 212(a)(9) anyone?) and how having a comprehensive solution can actually fix the immigration pothole in the legislative superhighway. Immigration Lawyers it is time to Stand Up and be vocal and beat back the immigration myths (http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?bc=27924).





    https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-8070452709764975137?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com


    More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/09/liar-what-does-health-care-have-to-do.html)





    hair Hugh Jackman and Nicole Kidman nicole kidman australia. Nicole Kidman graces the cover
  • Nicole Kidman graces the cover



  • minimalist
    10-08 02:25 PM
    Did you take original 485 receipt with you?

    I went to the Arlington DMV today. They took copies of my I-485 and EAD. They said they will send a letter to my home in 7 to 10 days, if I'm eligible for a drivers license. I went a month back when I didn't have the EAD with me and they did not even accept my documents for faxing it to Richmond. Man...its getting crazier everyday.

    Please post back your experience here. Thanks for starting the thread.



    more...


    nicole kidman australia. Nicole Kidman in UK Film
  • Nicole Kidman in UK Film



  • whiteStallion
    06-16 06:48 PM
    I am not sure about six months ... That is only when you file 485 and want to use AC21 to continue your GC process.

    Once your I-140 is approved, then you lock the PD from that moment itself.

    I140 + 6 months = Change your employer, file new PERM & then new I140 but you get to keep your old PD from old PERM. Is it not the case ?





    hot 49) Australia nicole kidman australia. Nicole Kidman Australian
  • Nicole Kidman Australian



  • rock
    03-14 06:01 PM
    Is there any way we can track that I-140 is either revoked or not by the old employer?



    more...


    house AUSTRALIA – Nicole Kidman nicole kidman australia. Nicole filmETThe
  • Nicole filmETThe



  • ameryki
    08-27 10:21 PM
    mate i am in the same boat as you. but I personally don't think anything can be done to change that. It is completely based on IO's judgement when approving application.





    tattoo Nicole Kidman stars in the new nicole kidman australia. Nicole Kidman and Hugh Jackman
  • Nicole Kidman and Hugh Jackman



  • gc4me
    04-23 10:18 AM
    this statement is not true. USCIS does not send I-140 approval to alien as it belongs to employer.
    u will get a copy of the approval notice directly from USCIS though.



    more...


    pictures Nicole Kidman On Set of nicole kidman australia. Nicole Kidman and Hugh Jackman
  • Nicole Kidman and Hugh Jackman



  • GCA
    09-15 01:05 PM
    hahah, interesting, funny but logical... I guess they just did not think through all this and why would they :mad:

    Had they able to think that far, may be many of the issues we face today wouldn't have cropped.





    dresses Nicole Kidman Australian nicole kidman australia. In Australia, people were
  • In Australia, people were



  • tp976
    12-31 01:53 PM
    No FP notice either. Check signatue for more details.

    sept 11 notice date, EAD approved for spouse and me. case transferred to TSC, no FP yet



    more...


    makeup Nicole Kidman atributes her nicole kidman australia. AUSTRALIA – Nicole Kidman
  • AUSTRALIA – Nicole Kidman



  • Wish_Good
    06-23 06:03 PM
    Hi Prashanthi,

    Thanks for your Service,

    Right now Iam also trying to apply one more H1 extension (my present H1 is valid till July 13, 2009) --with the same employer.

    Please advice me.

    Thanks a Lot in Advance.





    girlfriend Nicole Kidman and Hugh Jackman nicole kidman australia. left: Nicole Kidman as
  • left: Nicole Kidman as



  • lj_rr
    08-24 01:13 PM
    Anyone found a solution for this yet?





    hairstyles Nicole Kidman in UK Film nicole kidman australia. filme com Nicole Kidman
  • filme com Nicole Kidman



  • gc28262
    09-10 02:58 PM
    I had a similar issue when I applied for AP from TSC.
    Online status said approved, but never received it for a couple of months.

    You probably will have to wait for 30 days if you haven't received it. If the address is incorrect and AP returns undeliverable you can request them to resend it.

    Please follow the following threads:
    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/forum70-self-filing-documents-forms-directions-mailing/23097-ap-approval-notice-sent-ap-not-received.html

    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/forum76-travel-out-of-country-and-re-entry-during-after-485-filing/24267-ap-lost-in-mail.html





    vasired
    08-15 03:21 PM
    Notice were from Nebraska.Recieved on 8/13 for me and 8/14 for my wife,even though both were posted on same date..good they gave up appointment at same date & same time





    lee.cook
    May 26th, 2007, 08:39 AM
    Hello,

    I was thinking off purchasing a Rocket Blower from Jessops and also a small brush.

    http://jessops.com/Store/s32860/0/Cleaning--and--Maintenance/Jessops/Rocket-Blower/details.aspx?&IsSearch=y&pageindex=1&comp=n
    http://jessops.com/Store/s7812/0/Cleaning--and--Maintenance/Jessops/Blower-Brush-(Small)/details.aspx?&comp=n (http://jessops.com/Store/s7812/0/Cleaning--and--Maintenance/Jessops/Blower-Brush-%28Small%29/details.aspx?&comp=n)

    Is the Rocket blower similar to the Bulb?

    Can anybody recommend these products, thank you.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment