Monday, June 20, 2011

jennifer aniston looks old

images Jennifer Aniston - 18 (Pacific jennifer aniston looks old. 42 years old.
  • 42 years old.



  • bomber
    08-16 06:28 PM
    Does anyone have any idea what the code stands for.

    485 RD 7/2
    ND 7/30
    FP date 8/28 for both me any my husband
    FP code 3

    Code 3 means "Fingerprinting, signatures and photos will be taken"





    wallpaper 42 years old. jennifer aniston looks old. Jennifer Aniston, 42 years old
  • Jennifer Aniston, 42 years old



  • smuggymba
    10-08 05:14 PM
    GCNirvana007 - Who filed you PERM? Who provided you with approved I-140? Who filed ur GC? ....company A.............right.............so u have to work for company A and yes u r obligated legally from USCIS perspective to work with them. Don't tell me u don't know this. Going thru GC process, one almost becomes an immigration lawyer so you should know this if u don't already.

    Recent H1-B company B has nothing to do with GC.

    Bottomline - Why did u file GC in EB category? ANSWER - To work for that employer A.

    Now u r saying something about company C running ur payroll.

    Ok. So whoever runs my payroll is my employer. Lets say its Company C.

    Question is

    Am I obligated to Company A in any way?
    Am I obligated to Company B which had my recent H1B?

    Based on the answers i am assuming no but will wait to hear from you guys.





    jennifer aniston looks old. Jennifer Aniston unveils new
  • Jennifer Aniston unveils new



  • franklin
    12-12 11:49 PM
    It depends on the terms of the contract.

    I think Washington is an "At Will" employment state, so no matter what a contract says, its pretty much !#*$. I'd do some research if I were you -google, get some state specific employment law advice, check your employee handbook etc.

    At Will means that either side (employer or employee) can end a contract at any point, AFAIK

    Employee handbook should spell it out. I guess they "could" force you to use your PTO - don't know of the legality in that.

    Just my opinion, not legal advice:o

    Quick search online got this:-

    At Will

    In Washington, employees are presumed to be "at will." At-will employees may be terminated for any reason, so long as it is not illegal. Generally, employees that work under an employment contract can only be terminated for reasons specified in the contract. In Washington, in order to overcome the at-will presumption, an employee must show that the employer made clear and unequivocal statements of job security to the employee.

    The most common exception to employment-at will is for public policy. This holds that an employee is wrongfully discharged if the termination is counter to an explicit policy of the government. One example is the discharge of an employee for filing a workers' compensation claim.

    Employee Handbooks

    While an employer is not required by law to have an employee handbook, in most cases, it is recommended. An employee handbook provides a centralized, complete and certain record of the employer's policies and procedures. It also provides more convenient access by employees and managers. At a minimum, an employee handbook should include:

    * A statement regarding the at-will employment relationship
    * An equal employment opportunity statement
    * A policy regarding sexual and other types of harassment in the workplace
    * Internet access, e-mail, and voice mail policies
    * The Family Medical Leave Act

    In Washington, in limited circumstances, the at-will presumption can be overcome and a just-cause employment relationship can be created by an employee's legitimate expectations that are grounded in an employer's policy statements. The employee has to show that the employer, through the employee manual or otherwise, made representations or promises that termination would be only for just cause.

    The laws regarding an employer's duties and responsibilities arising under an employee handbook are complex, and a licensed attorney should be contacted to review individual circumstances.





    2011 Jennifer Aniston, 42 years old jennifer aniston looks old. JENNIFER Aniston is eager to
  • JENNIFER Aniston is eager to



  • zCool
    05-21 03:06 PM
    Well i dont think thats true that it is must that i have to send the AC21. Like i can always get the employment letter from my employer who sponsered me for my green card. All i was asking was that IF I DO GET THE EVL RFE (I HOPE NOT) then in that instance what i am suppose to do? Get a letter from my current employer or the employer who sponsored me for green card?

    You have to get it from your prospective permanant employer. If you have intention of working for your past employer after you get GC, that would be it,
    If you've made decision to work for your current employer on Permanant basis then that would be it..
    It's not good or bad.. just keep it simple



    more...


    jennifer aniston looks old. Jennifer Aniston on date with
  • Jennifer Aniston on date with



  • gcdreamer05
    04-17 01:17 PM
    Yes, absolutely.

    Hi Attorney Aruben,

    Legally if a person has a valid h1 approval and a valid h1 stamp on his passport and is getting paid and has all pay stubs , does an IO sitting at POE have any right to send back the person ?

    This also applies to the same situation wherein, the question posters m-in-law has valid documents and is coming back on visitor visa - provided she carries all her docs , does the IE have legal rights to send back the person at POE.

    If IO does not allow the person at POE wat rights as a visitor / non immigrant (h1b) / immigrant (EAD) has and what should one do at POE if we are not allowed in.

    We really appreciate your time and effort for replying to our questions on this forum.

    Thanks.





    jennifer aniston looks old. Jennifer Aniston gives Bradley
  • Jennifer Aniston gives Bradley



  • pani_6
    11-16 04:15 PM
    Celebrated for Krishna killing of the evil Narakasura.Unfortunately..this has become commercial like chirstmas and people forget the real reason and start interpreting thier own stories..it also marks Ram's return to Ayodhya after defeating Ravan.



    more...


    jennifer aniston looks old. Jennifer Aniston is America#39;s
  • Jennifer Aniston is America#39;s



  • FredG
    May 1st, 2005, 07:27 PM
    Spinning wheels on your 3rd and 4th shots in particular, with a blurred background, would give a very clear feeling of a dirt bike roaring into the air and the expectation of a dirt-spewing landing.Actually, he did get just that. But he was panning so fast that it took several hours for the blur to catch up with the rest of the image.





    2010 Jennifer Aniston unveils new jennifer aniston looks old. Jennifer Aniston - 18 (Pacific
  • Jennifer Aniston - 18 (Pacific



  • EternityInLimbo
    05-02 09:55 PM
    Well, i feel its more of a Policy decision.If they really want to do something fast they will do it anyhow.The best example is how this woman from canada i guess,who got US citizenship in 2 days,yes its right '2 days' so she can represent US in the ongoing Winter Olympics at Turin.

    Even CA state used to abjudicate Labor cases in 1 Months Time back until 2000.Later on 0 approval cases from then on.Surprising??

    Absolutely it's a policy decision: not only in terms of prioritization of activities but in terms of resource allocation. DOL insists they have enough resources to meet their goals. They have to report how well they're doing on their annual federal scorecard, and if they set their objectives low enough, they get an "A"... that is, if activities serving non-voters were even being tracked as one of their objectives.

    One of the clerks at my immigrations law firm said the word was, DOL was prioritizing getting cases into the Permanent Backlog System, as opposed to allocating staff/resources into completing reviews. Don't know if this is old news posted elsewhere or consistent with what others have heard, but if this is the case, it would explain why approvals have been few and far between.



    more...


    jennifer aniston looks old. Jennifer Aniston
  • Jennifer Aniston



  • suman
    12-17 10:04 AM
    What is NOID? If i don't respond do i have the time to respond. How much time do i have?

    And what is RFE?

    Thanks

    No one will deny the case. You will get NOID notice to deny and if you don't respond then it is denied. So you still have lot of time to respond.

    Don't worry much, keep looking into your case history and if you suspect any RFE be prepared for it.





    hair JENNIFER Aniston is eager to jennifer aniston looks old. aniston.bmp. Looks like
  • aniston.bmp. Looks like



  • Ann Ruben
    07-05 09:02 PM
    It is certainly possible to continue the green card process in your situation. The key requirement is that once your PD becomes current you MUST have a full time permanent job offer in the US, which you intend to accept.

    If you abandon your I-485 and pursue consular processing, that position MUST be in the same position and with the same employer that obtained your labor certification. AC-21 DOES NOT APPLY TO CONSULAR PROCESSING. If you maintain either your A/P validity or H-1 visa validity, as long as the position is in the "same or similar occupation", it can be with any US employer.

    Keep in mind that even if your family ends up abandoning their I-485's, as long as you do not abandon your I-485 they will be able to "follow to join" you once your AOS is granted.

    Also keep in mind the possibility of EB-1 eligibility if your position with the new company can be characterized as managerial or executive and you are able to secure a transfer back to the US in a managerial or executive position after working in India for at least one year.

    I hope this information is helpful,

    Ann



    more...


    jennifer aniston looks old. She looks like Diane Kruger
  • She looks like Diane Kruger



  • averagedesi
    08-29 09:14 PM
    mate i am in the same boat as you. but I personally don't think anything can be done to change that. It is completely based on IO's judgement when approving application.

    There should be some basis for their judgement right? they just cannot make arbitrary decisions right? The thing is I am not sure what the procedure is when there are issues with the EAD. I am apprehensive to return my EAD for USCIS to make the correction as it expires in 3 weeks





    hot Jennifer Aniston on date with jennifer aniston looks old. Jennifer Aniston shows off new
  • Jennifer Aniston shows off new



  • srgadi
    07-21 01:23 AM
    Wont' redirection of US Mail work to forward these?

    Nope, USCIS requests USPS to not to forward but return to sender if not delivered.



    more...


    house The 39-year-old, rumoured to jennifer aniston looks old. PHOTOS: Jen Aniston#39;s hottest
  • PHOTOS: Jen Aniston#39;s hottest



  • upuaut
    10-21 01:42 AM
    I agree





    tattoo Jennifer Aniston gives Bradley jennifer aniston looks old. Jennifer Aniston shows off new
  • Jennifer Aniston shows off new



  • chprav
    10-24 09:47 AM
    I've not get EAD and AP and been waiting for last few months. My wife got both EAD and AP. Is it good idea to call USCIS I/O about my status of EAD and AP? I applied for all 485/EAD/AP in june last week and got the notice on Aug 15th. Please check my signature for more information.

    Please suggest me.

    If I've to call, what is the procedure? Please let me know



    more...


    pictures Jennifer Aniston is America#39;s jennifer aniston looks old. The 41-year-old has admitted
  • The 41-year-old has admitted



  • fromnaija
    04-05 04:27 PM
    I am in similar situation with only three months left on my H1. My strategy is to apply for three year extension through current employer (done).
    Transfer to new employer only when I have an approved three year extension and then reapply PERM, I140 in EB2.
    I don't think 7 months are enough to get to I140 stage. Give room for things going south and for RFE if any.


    Being from ROW, porting PD is least of my worries because PD for EB2 ROW is current so I don't really have to port my PD. My only concern is if I have enough time to get my I-140 approved from the new employer so that I can continue to extend my H1B. From my calculation above, there is enough time but I am not sure if have missed any steps or miscalculated the processing times.

    As for EB2 from the current company, that isn't working out well hence the drastic measure to move company.





    dresses Jennifer Aniston shows off new jennifer aniston looks old. Jennifer Aniston is 42 years
  • Jennifer Aniston is 42 years



  • GotGC??
    01-12 05:29 PM
    I understand this topic has been discussed ad nauseam, so I'm not raising this issue per se. I do not know where we stand on the likelihood of this provision getting passed by Feb 15th, but I do know that the Core group must be trying their best to get some provisions along these lines.

    But just in case the "AOS without current PD" is seen as too big a change by the law makers or its sponsors in the undustry, I think it might be worthwhile to consider some of its watered-down alternatives. The law makers themselves may have a perception of this provision "creating a log jam at the AOS stage", not unlike the (mis)perception of some of IV members themselves!

    Some alternatives are:
    (a) Ability to file I-485 if the I-140 has been approved for X years, or if the I-140 has been pending for Y years (this is similar the provision of the ability to file H1 extensions beyond 6 years if a labor is pending). The advantage of this provision is that this will sound familiar with an already existing law; and will let the floodgates to AOS slowly and in a more controlled manner.

    (b) Ability to file I-485 if the PD is within N years of the published PD in the Visa Bulletin. For example, assuming N = 2 years, India EB3 with PD 5/11/03 and India EB2 01/08/05 can file. Again this has the advantage of a more controlled entry via the Visa Bulletin, but at least it'll start clearing the queue and people can get their EAD, FBI name check, while waiting for the visa numbers to be available.

    (c) If an Labor has been approved for X years
    (d) If the alien has been on H1 for Y years
    or a combination of any of the above

    Please understand that I whole heartedly support the "AOS without current PD" provision; it's just that it would be wise to be ready with some alternatives should the need arise.



    more...


    makeup Jennifer Aniston jennifer aniston looks old. The 39-year-old, rumoured to
  • The 39-year-old, rumoured to



  • map_boiler
    09-25 05:22 PM
    ...but could be due to unavailability of visa numbers for EB2-I in September. So even though the ported PD of Nov 2004 is current in September, the October visa bulletin has clarified that the EB2-I numbers were actually unavailable in September. See below:

    E. EMPLOYMENT VISA AVAILABILITY

    Item E of the May 2008 Visa Bulletin (number 118, volume VIII) indicated that many Employment cut-off dates had been advancing very rapidly, based on indications that the Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) would need to review a significantly larger pool of applicants than there were numbers available in order to maximize number use under the FY-2008 annual limits. That item also indicated that if the CIS projections proved to be incorrect, it would be necessary to adjust the cut-off dates during the final quarter of FY-2008. The CIS estimates have proven to be very high resulting in: 1) the “unavailability” of all Employment Third preference categories beginning in July, 2) the “unavailability” of numbers for China and India Employment Second preference adjustment of status cases during September, and 3) the establishment of many October Employment cut-off dates which are earlier than those which applied during FY-2008.

    Little if any forward movement of the cut-off dates in most Employment categories is likely until the extent of the CIS backlog of old priority dates can be determined. It is estimated that the FY-2009 Employment-based annual limit will be very close to the 140,000 minimum.





    girlfriend Jennifer Aniston shows off new jennifer aniston looks old. victim Jennifer aniston,
  • victim Jennifer aniston,



  • imneedy
    05-22 05:21 PM
    Now if we can transfer our priority date from old system we would definitely get some benefit in the new system. Any comments ?

    Let's hope :o





    hairstyles She looks like Diane Kruger jennifer aniston looks old. Jennifer Aniston looks like an
  • Jennifer Aniston looks like an



  • gc_on_demand
    04-04 10:41 AM
    I have a question - If a person has not even filed for 485 as is the case because dates never moved beyond July 2007 then how come NVC sends out fee invoice?

    When you are in USA and want to adjustment of status with USCIS then only you need to fill out I 485. If you are in USA or not and want to apply for gc at abroad consulate then you select option in I 140 form which will route your I 140 once approved to NVC. NVC keep I 140 with them until they think date will be current soon. and they send out fee invoice.

    If you pay fees and still your date doesn't become current for year , you loose fees since consulate return file back to NVC after a while. Generally NVC be little cautious and guess date so applicant don't loose fees, from this I think if any one get fees notice beyond July 2007 then we can safely say that date will be atleast there at the end of year.I read online that one lawyer mentioned his / her client got fee notice for Nov 2007 case. To me date will go upto Nov 2007 by Sep 2011. I would like to find if more people are getting such fee invoice mail / email.





    smc
    07-26 12:47 PM
    This looks like he is trying it again. The older one (which was defeated) was Amendment 2339 of HR 2669, which was defeated on 7/19. This is Amendment 2428 of HR 2638 (which they are currently debating) and has a date of 7/25.

    Hope it passes this time.





    mrjonie
    03-09 05:20 PM
    Received by USCIS on June 4th 2007. Have been waiting since.
    So 400+ days for me too...

    I totally agree with all you guys on the delay in 140..I was also in the same situation...Applied 140/485 in the July/August 2007 fiasco in EB3 (PD Dec 2006) ..After a long wait, received a mail on Feb 26th 2009 , stating that my 140 is approved...

    Good luck to you follks..lets hope for the best...



    No comments:

    Post a Comment